and all the drug companies are now protected from lawsuites, why? When did
WeThePeople give corporations the ability to HARM us, violates Common Law,
which is the Law of the Land
On Monday, December 20, 2021, 12:40:51 PM CST, nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx
<nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Desmond and All Family:
It is good sharing of yours.
. . . ” when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission
from men that produce nothing — when you see that money is flowing to those who
deal, not in goods but in favors — when you see that men get richer by graft
and pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but
protect them against you — you may know your society is doomed. Quote-Excerpt
from Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shugged , Fransico’s speech page 413 (hard bound).
Shining Emperor
On Sunday, December 19, 2021, 02:55:37 AM PST, Skye Dymond
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How does Article VI resolveconflicts between state & federal laws?
Article 6 resolves conflicts bystating, "This Constitution, and the laws of the
United States, whichshall be made in the pursuance thereof, and all treaties,
made, shall be thesupreme law of the land, and the judges in every state shall
be bound therebyany thing in the Constitution or laws of any state to the ...
Search for: How does ArticleVI resolve conflicts between state & federal laws?
How does Article VI of theConstitution take power away from the states?
The prioritizing of federal over state powers is known as the“doctrine of
preemption.” Article VI also provides that both federal and stateofficials—
including legislators and judges— must obey the U.S.Constitution (state
officials have a duty to obey their own stateconstitutions and laws as well).
4 U.S. Code § 101 - Oathby members of legislatures and officers
· U.S.Code
prev | next
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
4 U.S. Code Chapter 5 - OFFICIAL TERRITORIAL PAPERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
4 U.S. Code Chapter 3 - SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT
|
|
|
Every member of a State legislature,and every executive and judicial officer of
a State,shall, before he proceeds to execute the duties of his office, take an
oath inthe following form, to wit: “I, A B, do solemnly swear that I will
support theConstitution of the United States.”
|
|
| |
Definition: State from 4 USC § 113(b)(2) | LII / Legal Information Insti...
|
|
|
On Thursday, December 16, 2021, 08:24:00 AM EST, Victor
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Or file charges in district court of the United states? 42 usc 1983
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
-------- Original Message --------
On Dec 16, 2021, 6:24 AM, Mike Price < pricemia97@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you! I tried calling the police to press charges on police... better luck
calling their insurance company providing indemnity insurance and ask their
insurance company if they have “pool re” or terrorist insurance.
On Wednesday, December 15, 2021, nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx <nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
NOTICE TO ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT:.[NATIONALS OR CITIZENS]ARE NOT REQUIRED.TO SHOW
IDENTIFICATIONTO A POLICE OFFICER!... The Police Officer swears by Oath to
uphold the United States Constitution as an Officer Of Law. Supreme Court
Decisions are Considered the Law of the Land In Regards to Constitutionally
Protected Rights, and they cannot be interpreted, or re-interpreted, as they
are 'stare decisis' (already reviewed and clearly described as Law)..SUPREME
COURT CASE:.
Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352, 1983) in which the United States Supreme
Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely for
refusing to present identification.
There is no such thing as
"Failure to identify"
YOU CAN SUE THE POLICE FOR AN ILLEGAL ARREST AND RESIST ARREST WITH IMPUNITY!..
"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be
restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself
as he would in repelling any other assault and battery."(State v. Robinson, 145
ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
"Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the
person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be
resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense."(State v. Mobley, 240 N.C.
476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may
where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an
offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he
may have submitted to such custody, without resistance."(Adams v. State, 121
Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).."These principles apply as well to an officer attempting
to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof
by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private
individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence."Jones v. State, 26 Tex.
App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“Federal law & Supreme Court cases apply to state court cases.”
Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990)
.
