Most city police don't have insurance, their chief should have required to
carry umbrella insurance, even as masquerator under Color of Law.
Please share your discovery to stop those extortions collectively.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:24 AM Mike Price <pricemia97@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you! I tried calling the police to press charges on police... better
luck calling their insurance company providing indemnity insurance and ask
their insurance company if they have “pool re” or terrorist insurance.
On Wednesday, December 15, 2021, nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx <nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
NOTICE TO ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT:
.
[NATIONALS OR CITIZENS]
ARE NOT REQUIRED
.
TO SHOW IDENTIFICATION
TO A POLICE OFFICER!
.
.
.
The Police Officer swears by Oath to uphold the *United States
Constitution* as an Officer Of Law. Supreme Court Decisions are
Considered the Law of the Land In Regards to Constitutionally Protected
Rights, and they cannot be interpreted, or re-interpreted, as they are
'stare decisis' (already reviewed and clearly described as Law).
.
SUPREME COURT CASE:.
Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352, 1983) in which the United States
Supreme Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen
merely for refusing to present identification.
There is no such thing as*"Failure to identify"*
*YOU CAN SUE THE POLICE **FOR AN ILLEGAL ARREST AND **RESIST ARREST
WITH IMPUNITY!*
*.*
.
"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to
be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending
himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery."
(State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
"Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case,
the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and
may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense."
(State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he
may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is
not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer,
even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance."
(Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
.
"These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an
arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the
use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual
who unlawfully uses such force and violence."
Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75;
Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
[image: Horizontal Divider 12]
“Federal law & Supreme Court cases apply to state court cases.”
*Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990)*
.
