Or file charges in district court of the United states? 42 usc 1983
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
-------- Original Message --------
On Dec 16, 2021, 6:24 AM, Mike Price wrote:
Thank you! I tried calling the police to press charges on police... better
luck calling their insurance company providing indemnity insurance and ask
their insurance company if they have “pool re” or terrorist insurance.
On Wednesday, December 15, 2021, nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx <nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
NOTICE TO ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT:
.
[NATIONALS OR CITIZENS]
ARE NOTREQUIRED
.
TO SHOW IDENTIFICATION
TO A POLICE OFFICER!
.
.
.
The Police Officer swears by Oath to uphold the United States Constitution
as an Officer Of Law. Supreme Court Decisions are Considered the Law of the
Land In Regards to Constitutionally Protected Rights, and they cannot be
interpreted, or re-interpreted, as they are 'stare decisis' (already
reviewed and clearly described as Law).
.
SUPREME COURT CASE:.
Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352, 1983) in which the United States Supreme
Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely for
refusing to present identification.
There is no such thing as
"Failure to identify"
YOU CAN SUE THE POLICE FOR AN ILLEGAL ARREST AND RESIST ARREST WITH IMPUNITY!
.
.
"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be
restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending
himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery."
(State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
"Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case,
the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and
may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense."
(State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he
may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is
not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer,
even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance."
(Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
.
"These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest,
who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of
unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who
unlawfully uses such force and violence."
Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75;
Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
[Horizontal Divider 12]
“Federal law & Supreme Court cases apply to state court cases.”
Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990)
.
