[windows2000] Re: How to tighten up your network - suggestions
- From: "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:54:33 -0400
Yes I understand kids will be kids but it covers you.
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Patrick <london31uk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> This is an idea I have suggested, and I think there is a good case to push
> this forward. Whats I have found is that no matter how tight you try to make
> things the kids will seek to break in. In most cases because they do not
> understand what the consequences could be if enforced.
>
> Really annoying.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Patrick
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:59:44 PM
>
> *Subject:* [windows2000] Re: How to tighten up your network - suggestions
>
> Well I am not sure about Australia but here we do have computer hacking
> laws and a simple "Your current computer activity appears to be illegal and
> you may be prosecuted if you do not cease and desist" dm to the computer may
> be enough. You of course also make sure that you have a proper logon
> privacy message in place prior to logon that requires an OK click.
> Here is ours:
> THIS SYSTEM IS FOR USE OF AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND ACTIVITIES ONLY!
> Activities may be subject to monitoring, recording, and periodic audits
> The system and all content are property of CCPL and are NOT considered
> private.
> The organization may access any users accounts or communications.
> Anyone using this system expressly consents to the above and to all CCPL
> Policies and Rules regarding
> computer and Internet use and security.
> OK
>
> This should cover you legally at least.
> Regards
> Jim Kenzig
> Blog: http://www.techblink.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Berny Stapleton
> <berny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Yes, it was actually regedit and they were modifying the SAM.
>>
>> Quite clever really, but a little frustrating.
>>
>> 2009/3/25 Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
>> <bcoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > Scheduled task can run in System context & allow someone to launch a
>> cmd
>> > prompt or something with basically full control of the system.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 3:39 AM
>> > To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Subject: [windows2000] Re: How to tighten up your network - suggestions
>> >
>> > Could you please elaborate on the scheduler thing, what's that about?
>> Thx.
>> > --
>> > /Sorin
>> >
>> >
>> >>-----Original Message-----
>> >>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:windows2000-
>> >>bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berny Stapleton
>> >>Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:38 PM
>> >>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>Subject: [windows2000] Re: How to tighten up your network - suggestions
>> >>
>> >>Oh, turn off the scheduler. Keep your patches up to date. (That's the
>> >>one that caught me)
>> >
>> >
>> > **********************
>> > To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>> > mode or view archives use the below link.
>> >
>> > //www.freelists.org/list/windows2000
>> >
>> **********************
>> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>> mode or view archives use the below link.
>>
>> //www.freelists.org/list/windows2000
>>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
