Mark H. Wilkinson <mhw+wily@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hmm; I'm not familiar with arch, so would have a preference for a CVS > repository. Are there sites offering free arch-hosting, or does that > concept not make sense? Not really. ArX and tla (gnu-arch is tla, I think) can put remote mirrors onto FTP, SFTP, WebDAV sites, I believe. You can download from those, or plain HTTP. I don't currently run any public archives, so I just use a common filesystem. It should all be on the tutorial for tla. Compare and contrast with CVS, that requires a single centralised server (or some nasty hacks) and misses some features such as renames and atomic commits. It's really worth switching, even though the arch docs aren't as polished as CVS's. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://slef@xxxxxxxxx