[THIN] Re: printer aggravation

  • From: andy mac <a_r_mc789@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 05:41:49 -0700 (PDT)

Uniprint Gateway is specifically designed for Thin Clients. Ive had a brief 
look and it looks ok

We use Standard Uniprint server as well, and that works fine


----- Original Message ----
From: Angus Macdonald <Angus.Macdonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2007 10:50:39 AM
Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation


I'm pretty sure Thinprint is explicitly supported by HP terminals so I'll look 
down that route.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of 
Russell Robertson
Sent: 01 October 2007 09:18
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation


Someone else mentioned ThinPrint and we used this precisely to reduce the size 
of print jobs. We were getting A3 CAD drawings printing out over a satellite 
link down to 15 seconds or so. Before ThinPrint, they were taking minutes to 
print.
 
Haven’t looked at it for a while though, I think there are lots of new features 
in the app.
 
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | W:www.virtualstream.co.uk |
 
 
 
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Jason Patten
Sent: 28 September 2007 15:14
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
 
Well I did some testing with Screwdrivers awhile back and it didnt work right 
with our check printing solution. As far as the size of spool jobs It really 
hasn't been an issue overall as far as I can tell.  Our apps primarily use 
active reports or unfortunately Crystal reports to generate the documents that 
users print. 


On 9/28/07, Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Amen to that.

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Landin, Mark 
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 11:28 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation

I endorse using Simplify/Screwdrivers. We installed it 4 years ago now
and never looked back. We've got HP's, Xerox multifunctions, Lexmarks,
and who knows what else out in the remote locations. It's been nothing 
but smooth for us!


-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of anthonyabraham@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Thu 9/27/2007 8:54 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation

For those who use the universal driver, how do you guys get around large 
spool files going over your WAN (assuming the Print Server and Citrix
Servers are across the WAN from your clients).  We've had issues where
PDF files spool to 150Mb and you can imagine the issues this causes as 
it traverses over a WAN.

We are looking at using Screwdrivers or possibly using the Universal
Driver with an indirect Printer Policy to get around this.

Has anyone else experienced this issue?





"Raffensberger, Stephen D" <sraffens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by:
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
28 Sep 2007 01:00 Mail Size: 16981

Please respond to
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
<thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject 
[THIN] Re: printer aggravation




Our Ref

Your Ref




Certainly you should take the LaserJet 1022?s out back and leave them
there. They are host-based.


From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:35 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation

So I take it the best solution is to quietly take the printers out back
and install updated drives with a baseball bat?  :)

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
To: thin
Subject: [THIN] printer aggravation 


FOr the most part  I love the new Universal printer, but even with that
I
am encountering various printers that do not print.  Primarily I am
having
trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022. 
Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all printers,
but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that
are
having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those 
paticular models that are giving me fits.

ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should use?
I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark T520,
and HP laserJet 1022 

Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and its
printer issues are always fun.







This message contains information which may be confidential and
privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for 
the
addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or
any
information contained in the message. If you have received the message
in
error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy 
the
message. Thank you.



******************************************************************
This message originated from the Internet. Its originator may or
may not be who they claim to be and the information contained in 
the message and any attachments may or may not be accurate.
******************************************************************


************************************************************
HSBC Bank Australia Limited 
ABN 48 006 434 162       AFSL 232595

Head Office:
Level 32, HSBC Centre
580 George Street, Sydney
NSW Australia 2000
************************************************************



----------------------------------------- 
*******************************************************************
This e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged.
If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose
or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error, 
please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail.

Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely,
secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability 
for any errors or omissions.
*******************************************************************
"SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!"

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************ 
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************ 
 
Gallai'r e-bost yma gynnwys gwybodaeth gyfrinachol a/neu ddeunydd hawlfraint. 
Os ydych chi'n meddwl eich bod wedi derbyn yr e-bost yma drwy gamgymeriad rydym 
yn ymddiheuro am hyn; peidiwch os gwelwch yn dda â datgelu, anfon ymlaen, 
printio, copïo na dosbarthu gwybodaeth yn yr e-bost yma na gweithredu mewn 
unrhyw fodd drwy ddibynnu ar ei gynnwys: gwaherddir gwneud hynny'n gyfan gwbl a 
gallai fod yn anghyfreithlon. Rhowch wybod i'r anfonwr fod y neges yma wedi 
mynd ar goll cyn ei dileu.
Mae unrhyw safbwynt neu farn a gyflwynir yn eiddo i'r awdur ac nid ydynt o 
anghenraid yn cynrychioli safbwynt neu farn Ymddiriedolaeth GIG Gogledd 
Orllewin Cymru.
Gallai cynnwys yr e-bost yma gael ei ddatgelu i'r cyhoedd o dan Gôd Bod yn 
Agored y GIG neu Ddeddf Rhyddid Gwybodaeth 2000. Nid oes modd gwarantu 
cyfrinachedd y neges ac unrhyw ateb. 
Bydd y neges yma ac unrhyw ffeiliau cysylltiedig wedi cael eu gwirio gan 
feddalwedd canfod firws cyn eu trosglwyddo. Ond rhaid i'r sawl sy'n derbyn 
wirio rhag firws ei hun cyn agor unrhyw ymgysylltiad. Nid yw'r Ymddiriedolaeth 
yn derbyn unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am unrhyw golled neu niwed a allai gael ei achosi 
gan firws meddalwedd.
 
This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. If 
you believe that you have received this e-mail in error please accept our 
apologies; please do not disclose, forward, print, copy or distribute 
information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to 
do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform the sender that 
this message has gone astray before deleting it.
Any views or opinions presented are to be understood as those of the author and 
do not necessarily represent those of the North West Wales NHS Trust.
The contents of this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under the NHS 
Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The confidentiality of 
the message and any reply cannot be guaranteed.
This message and any attached files will have been checked with virus detection 
software before transmission. However, recipients must carry out their own 
virus checks before opening any attachment. The Trust accepts no liability for 
any loss or damage, which may be caused by software viruses.


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for 
today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow  

Other related posts: