[THIN] Re: printer aggravation

  • From: Jan <tinybeetle@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:54:06 -0400

According to HP's web site this is a host based printer. The only thing that
has a chance of working is the UPD.

http://www.shopping.hp.com/shopping/data_sheet/q5912a.html


On 10/1/07, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What driver does everyone use for the HP LaserJet 1022?  Off brian Madden
> site I used the HP LaserJet 1100(MS). but the printer still did not print
>
> On 10/1/07, Angus Macdonald <Angus.Macdonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >  I'm pretty sure Thinprint is explicitly supported by HP terminals so
> > I'll look down that route.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]*On
> > Behalf Of *Russell Robertson
> > *Sent:* 01 October 2007 09:18
> > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> >
> >  Someone else mentioned ThinPrint and we used this precisely to reduce
> > the size of print jobs. We were getting A3 CAD drawings printing out over a
> > satellite link down to 15 seconds or so. Before ThinPrint, they were taking
> > minutes to print.
> >
> >
> >
> > Haven't looked at it for a while though, I think there are lots of new
> > features in the app.
> >
> >
> >
> > Russell
> >
> > Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | W:www.virtualstream.co.uk |
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> > Behalf Of *Jason Patten
> > *Sent:* 28 September 2007 15:14
> > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> >
> >
> >
> > Well I did some testing with Screwdrivers awhile back and it didnt work
> > right with our check printing solution. As far as the size of spool jobs It
> > really hasn't been an issue overall as far as I can tell.  Our apps
> > primarily use active reports or unfortunately Crystal reports to generate
> > the documents that users print.
> >
> >  On 9/28/07, *Evan Mann* <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Amen to that.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Landin, Mark
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 11:28 PM
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> >
> > I endorse using Simplify/Screwdrivers. We installed it 4 years ago now
> > and never looked back. We've got HP's, Xerox multifunctions, Lexmarks,
> > and who knows what else out in the remote locations. It's been nothing
> > but smooth for us!
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of anthonyabraham@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Thu 9/27/2007 8:54 PM
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> >
> > For those who use the universal driver, how do you guys get around large
> >
> > spool files going over your WAN (assuming the Print Server and Citrix
> > Servers are across the WAN from your clients).  We've had issues where
> > PDF files spool to 150Mb and you can imagine the issues this causes as
> > it traverses over a WAN.
> >
> > We are looking at using Screwdrivers or possibly using the Universal
> > Driver with an indirect Printer Policy to get around this.
> >
> > Has anyone else experienced this issue?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Raffensberger, Stephen D" <sraffens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by:
> > thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 28 Sep 2007 01:00 Mail Size: 16981
> >
> > Please respond to
> > thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > To
> > < thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Our Ref
> >
> > Your Ref
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Certainly you should take the LaserJet 1022?s out back and leave them
> > there. They are host-based.
> >
> >
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Jason Patten
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:35 AM
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> >
> > So I take it the best solution is to quietly take the printers out back
> > and install updated drives with a baseball bat?  :)
> >
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Jason Patten
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
> > To: thin
> > Subject: [THIN] printer aggravation
> >
> >
> > FOr the most part  I love the new Universal printer, but even with that
> > I
> > am encountering various printers that do not print.  Primarily I am
> > having
> > trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022.
> > Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all printers,
> > but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that
> > are
> > having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those
> > paticular models that are giving me fits.
> >
> > ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should use?
> > I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark T520,
> > and HP laserJet 1022
> >
> > Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and its
> > printer issues are always fun.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This message contains information which may be confidential and
> > privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for
> > the
> > addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or
> > any
> > information contained in the message. If you have received the message
> > in
> > error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy
> > the
> > message. Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > ******************************************************************
> > This message originated from the Internet. Its originator may or
> > may not be who they claim to be and the information contained in
> > the message and any attachments may or may not be accurate.
> > ******************************************************************
> >
> >
> > ************************************************************
> > HSBC Bank Australia Limited
> > ABN 48 006 434 162       AFSL 232595
> >
> > Head Office:
> > Level 32, HSBC Centre
> > 580 George Street, Sydney
> > NSW Australia 2000
> > ************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > *******************************************************************
> > This e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged.
> > If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose
> > or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error,
> > please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the
> > sender immediately by return e-mail.
> >
> > Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely,
> > secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability
> > for any errors or omissions.
> > *******************************************************************
> > "SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!"
> >
> > ************************************************
> > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > ************************************************
> > ************************************************
> > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > ************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> > Gallai'r e-bost yma gynnwys gwybodaeth gyfrinachol a/neu ddeunydd
> > hawlfraint. Os ydych chi'n meddwl eich bod wedi derbyn yr e-bost yma drwy
> > gamgymeriad rydym yn ymddiheuro am hyn; peidiwch os gwelwch yn dda â
> > datgelu, anfon ymlaen, printio, copïo na dosbarthu gwybodaeth yn yr e-bost
> > yma na gweithredu mewn unrhyw fodd drwy ddibynnu ar ei gynnwys: gwaherddir
> > gwneud hynny'n gyfan gwbl a gallai fod yn anghyfreithlon. Rhowch wybod i'r
> > anfonwr fod y neges yma wedi mynd ar goll cyn ei dileu.
> >
> > Mae unrhyw safbwynt neu farn a gyflwynir yn eiddo i'r awdur ac nid ydynt
> > o anghenraid yn cynrychioli safbwynt neu farn Ymddiriedolaeth GIG Gogledd
> > Orllewin Cymru.
> >
> > Gallai cynnwys yr e-bost yma gael ei ddatgelu i'r cyhoedd o dan Gôd Bod
> > yn Agored y GIG neu Ddeddf Rhyddid Gwybodaeth 2000. Nid oes modd gwarantu
> > cyfrinachedd y neges ac unrhyw ateb.
> >
> > Bydd y neges yma ac unrhyw ffeiliau cysylltiedig wedi cael eu gwirio gan
> > feddalwedd canfod firws cyn eu trosglwyddo. Ond rhaid i'r sawl sy'n derbyn
> > wirio rhag firws ei hun cyn agor unrhyw ymgysylltiad. Nid yw'r
> > Ymddiriedolaeth yn derbyn unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am unrhyw golled neu niwed a
> > allai gael ei achosi gan firws meddalwedd.
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright
> > material. If you believe that you have received this e-mail in error please
> > accept our apologies; please do not disclose, forward, print, copy or
> > distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its
> > contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform
> > the sender that this message has gone astray before deleting it.
> >
> > Any views or opinions presented are to be understood as those of the
> > author and do not necessarily represent those of the North West Wales NHS
> > Trust.
> >
> > The contents of this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under
> > the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The
> > confidentiality of the message and any reply cannot be guaranteed.
> >
> > This message and any attached files will have been checked with virus
> > detection software before transmission. However, recipients must carry out
> > their own virus checks before opening any attachment. The Trust accepts no
> > liability for any loss or damage, which may be caused by software viruses.
> >
> >
>

Other related posts: