[THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: anthonyabraham@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:54:34 +1100
For those who use the universal driver, how do you guys get around large
spool files going over your WAN (assuming the Print Server and Citrix
Servers are across the WAN from your clients). We've had issues where PDF
files spool to 150Mb and you can imagine the issues this causes as it
traverses over a WAN.
We are looking at using Screwdrivers or possibly using the Universal
Driver with an indirect Printer Policy to get around this.
Has anyone else experienced this issue?
"Raffensberger, Stephen D" <sraffens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
28 Sep 2007 01:00 Mail Size: 16981
Please respond to
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[THIN] Re: printer aggravation
Our Ref
Your Ref
Certainly you should take the LaserJet 1022?s out back and leave them
there. They are host-based.
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:35 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
So I take it the best solution is to quietly take the printers out back
and install updated drives with a baseball bat? :)
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
To: thin
Subject: [THIN] printer aggravation
FOr the most part I love the new Universal printer, but even with that I
am encountering various printers that do not print. Primarily I am having
trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022.
Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all printers,
but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that are
having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those
paticular models that are giving me fits.
ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should use?
I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark T520,
and HP laserJet 1022
Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and its
printer issues are always fun.
This message contains information which may be confidential and
privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the
addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any
information contained in the message. If you have received the message in
error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the
message. Thank you.
******************************************************************
This message originated from the Internet. Its originator may or
may not be who they claim to be and the information contained in
the message and any attachments may or may not be accurate.
******************************************************************
************************************************************
HSBC Bank Australia Limited
ABN 48 006 434 162 AFSL 232595
Head Office:
Level 32, HSBC Centre
580 George Street, Sydney
NSW Australia 2000
************************************************************
-----------------------------------------
*******************************************************************
This e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged.
If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose
or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error,
please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail.
Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely,
secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability
for any errors or omissions.
*******************************************************************
"SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!"
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Landin, Mark
- References:
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Raffensberger, Stephen D
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Landin, Mark
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Raffensberger, Stephen D