[THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: "Jason Patten" <jasoncitrix@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:19:27 -0400
Wow I guess I didn't realize how good I had it... ANd here I was
complaining about 2-3 types of printers that are proving to be real
headaches. Though I have noticed the PCL6 drivers on the HP laserJets are
proving to be a pain in the rear. I try and get the users to switch over
to PS drivers as much as possible. Though when they do for some reason on
our check writer module the MICR line gets moved down one line and causes
problems with the banks.
On 9/27/07, Jensen, Jay <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Lucky dog!! We have multi-functional printers (Xerox) that are a Print
> Driver nightmare! One thing I have found out is never install a Xerox PCL
> printer driver. Use only PS print drivers with Xerox and make sure the
> driver has been cleared by Xerox in Terminal Server / Citrix as a good
> printer otherwise(test first-don't believe them), major
> headaches/problems….I'm getting sick!!! :J
>
>
>
> *Jay *
> *TCS Americas Technology - La Crosse*
> *Citrix Server Team*
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jason Patten
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:49 AM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
>
>
>
> well for us its a great thing because we don't have to worry about
> aliasing a few hundred types of printers. Our client base is entirely
> remote PC's stationed in hotel back offices or at various management company
> offices, It is extremely heterogeneous. Not having to worry about drivers
> and getting as close to plug-n-print as we can simplifies our support life
> immensely.
>
> On 9/27/07, *Beckett, William (Bill)* <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Along these same lines, what is the advantage of the universal driver or
> better question, enforcing universal for all printers? Obviously not having
> to install 100 drivers on your citrix box is the obvious answer but what if
> you only have a handful of drivers to worry about? Then you use universal if
> someone has say a home printer they need to connect fom the outside.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jason Patten
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
> *To:* thin
> *Subject:* [THIN] printer aggravation
>
> FOr the most part I love the new Universal printer, but even with that I
> am encountering various printers that do not print. Primarily I am having
> trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022.
> Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all printers,
> but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that are
> having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those
> paticular models that are giving me fits.
>
> ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should use?
> I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark T520,
> and HP laserJet 1022
>
> Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and its
> printer issues are always fun.
>
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Greg Reese
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jensen, Jay
- References:
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jason Patten
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jensen, Jay
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Greg Reese
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jensen, Jay
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jason Patten
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jensen, Jay