[THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: "Greg Reese" <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:26:55 -0500
story of my life....
On 9/27/07, Beckett, William (Bill) <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Maybe we're just doing something wrong Greg ;)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Greg Reese
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:08 AM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
>
>
> I am running PS 4.5 with v10.0 of the client. We've also got HP thin
> clients with XPe in the mix. That isn't helping matters.
>
> On 9/27/07, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > with Presentation server 4? We do have to make sure our clients have at
> > least 9.2webclient. I have been upgrading them to 10.0 or 10.1 for the
> > most part and it seems to work for I'd say close to 98% of the users, maybe
> > better than that. Out of the close to 800 concurrent users we have Id say
> > I have at most 10 users that simply cannot print using universal driver.
> >
> >
> > On 9/27/07, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a tough time with the universal driver. it has been hit or
> > > miss for us. Most of the time, users get get blank pages out of it.
> > >
> > > On 9/27/07, Beckett, William (Bill) <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Along these same lines, what is the advantage of the universal
> > > > driver or better question, enforcing universal for all printers?
> > > > Obviously
> > > > not having to install 100 drivers on your citrix box is the obvious
> > > > answer
> > > > but what if you only have a handful of drivers to worry about? Then you
> > > > use
> > > > universal if someone has say a home printer they need to connect fom the
> > > > outside.
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > *On Behalf Of *Jason Patten
> > > > *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
> > > > *To:* thin
> > > > *Subject:* [THIN] printer aggravation
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > FOr the most part I love the new Universal printer, but even with
> > > > that I am encountering various printers that do not print. Primarily I
> > > > am
> > > > having trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022.
> > > > Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all
> > > > printers, but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those
> > > > users
> > > > that are having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for
> > > > those paticular models that are giving me fits.
> > > >
> > > > ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should
> > > > use?
> > > > I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark
> > > > T520, and HP laserJet 1022
> > > >
> > > > Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and
> > > > its printer issues are always fun.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jason Patten
- References:
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Greg Reese
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Beckett, William (Bill)
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jason Patten
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Greg Reese
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Beckett, William (Bill)