[THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: "Greg Reese" <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:06:41 -0500
don't get me wrong, I would love to use it. It just doesn't seem to be any
less aggravating than any other print driver.
On 9/27/07, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> well for us its a great thing because we don't have to worry about
> aliasing a few hundred types of printers. Our client base is entirely
> remote PC's stationed in hotel back offices or at various management company
> offices, It is extremely heterogeneous. Not having to worry about drivers
> and getting as close to plug-n-print as we can simplifies our support life
> immensely.
>
> On 9/27/07, Beckett, William (Bill) < WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Along these same lines, what is the advantage of the universal driver
> > or better question, enforcing universal for all printers? Obviously not
> > having to install 100 drivers on your citrix box is the obvious answer but
> > what if you only have a handful of drivers to worry about? Then you use
> > universal if someone has say a home printer they need to connect fom the
> > outside.
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> > Behalf Of *Jason Patten
> > *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
> > *To:* thin
> > *Subject:* [THIN] printer aggravation
> >
> >
> > FOr the most part I love the new Universal printer, but even with that
> > I am encountering various printers that do not print. Primarily I am having
> > trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022.
> > Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all printers,
> > but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that are
> > having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those
> > paticular models that are giving me fits.
> >
> > ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should use?
> > I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark T520,
> > and HP laserJet 1022
> >
> > Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and its
> > printer issues are always fun.
> >
> >
>
- References:
- [THIN] printer aggravation
- From: Jason Patten
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Beckett, William (Bill)
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jason Patten
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- » [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- [THIN] printer aggravation
- From: Jason Patten
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Beckett, William (Bill)
- [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: Jason Patten