[THIN] Re: Novell Integration

  • From: "Stansel, Paul" <Paul.Stansel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:16:56 -0400

Which version of Zen are you running?

-Paul

> ----------
> From:         Mobeen Azhar[SMTP:moby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Reply To:     thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent:         Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:06 PM
> To:   thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:      [THIN] Re: Novell Integration
> 
> We are using Novell eDirectory, ZfD (ZenWorks for Desktops) in a very
> large 
> terminal server + Citrix MetaFrame environement without any major issues.
> The 
> product works great, and Novell's ZenWorks has been a big help in getting 
> applications, especially ones that have a large and complex user piece,
> easily 
> and quickly distributed to Windows NT and 2000 terminal servers.  The
> terminal 
> servers are divided between some that are in NT domains and some that in
> AD.  No 
> issues with either side as far as any software from Novell is concerned.
> 
> So far we have not implemented any type of password synchronization
> between 
> Novell's eDirectory and Microsoft's AD, although my tests in a lab setting
> have 
> been successfull in delivering what Novell "says on paper".  We do
> synchronize 
> credentials between Novell's eDirectory and NT domains using Novell's
> Account 
> Management product.
> 
> The nice thing we have found with ZfD is that the application effort
> expended 
> for our desktops (10,000+) does not have to be repeated for integrating
> the same 
> applications on our Citrix/Terminal servers.  We can use the same ZfD 
> application object on both desktops and terminal servers with very minor 
> modifications.
> 
> --Moby
> 
> PS:  Regarding the comment "Novell has decided NetWare is dead" by Ron
> Oglesby, 
>   I am not sure if Ron works for Novell to know that.  Either way, I am
> sure you 
> are not developing applications on NetWare.  Services traditionally
> associated 
> with NetWare have been available on non-NetWare platforms for quite some
> time. 
> One really uses products such eDirectory, ZenWorks, etc.  One really does
> not do 
> much with NetWare itself.  While people might argue whether NetWare
> development 
> is going to continue or not (the vendor, Novell, says it will continue),
> these 
> other applications have been ported to non-NetWare operating systems.  One
> of 
> the coolest things I like about ZfD is that it can be run in a totally 
> non-NetWare environemnt - pure 100% Windows.
> 
> 
> Matt Kosht wrote:
> > I pulled the trigger on Zen/Novell route myself this past weekend.  
> > Still chasing down problems (printing mostly). Zen on paper looks 
> > great in practice very buggy/problematic. Also had some apps that had to
> 
> > map drive letters to Windows servers that's fun w/o any Windows
> credentials.
> >  
> >   Microsoft has a product called Metadirectory service that can 
> > supposedly sync the two directories AD and eDirectory.
> > I am thinking that might be the best option to solve this dilemma.
> >  
> > I am just wishing I could have pulled the plug on Novell altogether and 
> > went pure AD but as John Belushi would say "Buuuttt Nooooo!".
> > 
> >  >>> craig@xxxxxxxxxxxx 9/9/2003 12:25:01 AM >>>
> > BTW, I decided to go the AD/Novell route without the Zenworks piece.  
> > It's going
> > to be a terrible pain, though, over the next few days as everyone has to
> 
> > sync
> > their Novell password with their new Windows password.  That's only 1500
> > students I get to deal with in a two day span.
> > 
> > What's even better about this setup is almost every app either has some 
> > video,
> > audio or COM port mapping that goes along with it.  Woooot!
> > 
> > Quoting craig@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
> > 
> >  > How did I know that you were going to respond?
> >  >
> >  > I might take a look at both solutions, then, this weekend.  I need to
> 
> > get
> >  > moving on this and I'm afraid that the Windows route is going to be a
> 
> > bit too
> >  >
> >  > burdensome.  At this point in time, the school has no plans to move
> from
> >  > NetWare any time soon.  Actually, their servers have been rock solid 
> > and have
> >  >
> >  > had no problems since their inception (knock on wood).
> >  >
> >  > I know NetWare enough to do whatever I need in NWAdmin.  Outside of 
> > that,
> >  > though, I have to rely on others.  We do have two guys though, that
> know
> >  > Novell
> >  > stuff inside and out.  So, I'm not too worried about the support.
> >  >
> >  > My biggest concern is not that one of these routes wont work - I know
> 
> > that
> >  > they
> >  > will.  My concern is about simplicity.  Their "administrator" doesnt
> know
> >  > much
> >  > in the way of network administration and thankfully she knows as 
> > much.  What
> >  > I
> >  > want is to be able to leave this project and know that Im not going 
> > to get a
> >  >
> >  > call every 4 hours on how to do such and such.  By adding in the
> Windows
> >  > component, I know that things will get a bit more complex than they
> would
> >  > have
> >  > with the ZENWorks route.
> >  >
> >  > Anyway, thanks for the input.  Ill take a look at the DLU/Zenworks 
> > deal a bit
> >  >
> >  > more today.
> >  >
> >  > Quoting Ron Oglesby <roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >  >
> >  > > Craig, Long time no see, or hear.....
> >  > > Anyway, the Netware piece works but is not in use as much as the 
> > windows
> >  > > stuff obviously. So when something breaks or doesn't work it is
> hard to
> >  > > find help (or even good support) on it.
> >  > >
> >  > > If you don't know novell doing this is problematic. I have a real
> good
> >  > > novel guy on my team so it doesn't scrare me. But if I didn't I
> would
> >  > > recommend Windows every time.
> >  > >
> >  > > I guess the question is that if you HAVE to implement this and no
> one
> >  > > else you still have to do what is best for the customer. If they
> don't
> >  > > want windows use netware just be prepared to LEARN a lot.
> >  > >
> >  > > BTW the roaming profile is assigned as a User attribute just like
> NT/2K
> >  > > and DLU handles creating the local user and setting up profiles
> etc....
> >  > >
> >  > > PS> Novell has decided netware is dead. No more development for
> that
> >  > > network OS. Instead all of their development if for Linux. Why stay
> 
> > with
> >  > > a dead product.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Ron Oglesby
> >  > > Senior Technical Architect
> >  > > 
> >  > > RapidApp
> >  > > Office 312.372.7188
> >  > > Mobile 815.325.7618
> >  > > email roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  > > 
> >  > >
> >  > > -----Original Message-----
> >  > > From: Craig M. Luchtefeld [mailto:craig@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >  > > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 7:56 AM
> >  > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  > > Subject: [THIN] Novell Integration
> >  > >
> >  > > Does anyone have any thoughts about which Novell integration route
> is
> >  > > better
> >  > > -- the ZENWorks/Dynamic Local User route or the simultaneous
> Windows
> >  > > 2000
> >  > > domain route with dual accounts?
> >  > >
> >  > > I've got a school I'm working with, approximately 1500 students 
> > with the
> >  > > environment holding anywhere from 150-200 concurrent sessions.
> We're
> >  > > still
> >  > > in the 'testing' phase, so we can still go either route for
> deployment.
> >  > > My
> >  > > problem with the Windows 2000/Novell route is that they're going to
> 
> > have
> >  > > to
> >  > > create two accounts for every student, we're going to have to 
> > sync/reset
> >  > > all
> >  > > their passwords, and they're going to have one more point of 
> > failure (if
> >  > > the
> >  > > DC goes down).
> >  > >
> >  > > Honestly, I need to read up a bit more on how the ZENWorks deal
> works,
> >  > > but
> >  > > if its creating a dynamic local user, my thought is how are roaming
> >  > > profiles
> >  > > going to work?
> >  > >
> >  > > Anyway, has anyone had the opportunity to take a look at both of
> these
> >  > > pieces and examine the advantages/disadvantages to both?  From the
> >  > > Advanced
> >  > > Guide for FR3, I saw the integration steps for them both, but if I
> >  > > remember
> >  > > correctly, it didn't state advantages/disadvantages to either.
> >  > >
> >  > > Thanks in advance,
> >  > >
> >  > > Craig
> >  > >
> >  > > ********************************************************
> >  > > This Week's Sponsor:  ThinPrint
> >  > > http://www.thinprint.com
> >  > > **********************************************************
> >  > > Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> >  > > http://thethin.net/links.cfm
> >  > >
> >  > > For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> >  > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> >  > > http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
> >  > > ********************************************************
> >  > > This Week's Sponsor:  ThinPrint
> >  > > http://www.thinprint.com
> >  > > **********************************************************
> >  > > Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> >  > > http://thethin.net/links.cfm
> >  > >
> >  > > For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> >  > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> >  > > http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > -------------------------------------------------
> >  > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> >  >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> > ********************************************************
> > This Week's Sponsor:  ThinPrint
> > http://www.thinprint.com
> > **********************************************************
> > Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> > http://thethin.net/links.cfm
> > 
> > For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
> 
> -- 
> --Moby
> 
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety 
> deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Benjamin Franklin
> 
> First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a
> Jew.
> Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was
> not a 
> Communist.
> Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I
> was not 
> a trade unionist.
> Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.  --
> Pastor 
> Martin Niemöller
> 
> ********************************************************
> This Week's Sponsor:  ThinPrint
> http://www.thinprint.com
> **********************************************************
> Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> http://thethin.net/links.cfm
> 
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
> 
********************************************************
This Week's Sponsor:  ThinPrint
http://www.thinprint.com
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thethin.net/links.cfm

For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm

Other related posts: