Brad, I tend to think that idea would help, but I don't know how much without constructing a model. Regards, Steve At 09:22 AM 1/21/2005 -0400, Brad Crowell wrote: >Yes, that is what I am suggesting. This would probably be a closer analogy >to a board to board connector than IC bond wires, as the physical scale >would be closer to the connector situation. > >Brad > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of steve weir > > Sent: January 21, 2005 9:06 AM > > To: brad.crowell@xxxxxxxxxx; Si-List > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: risetime effects of plane breaks > > > > > > Brad, are you proposing parallel tracks on the signal layer > > interdigitated > > 1:N signal traces that extend completely across an island? > > > > Steve > > At 08:50 AM 1/21/2005 -0400, Brad Crowell wrote: > > >Chris's analogy to wire bonding makes me wonder if this would be > > helpful in > > >crossing splits. Assuming one can't avoid it and has to cross a > > plane split > > >with a bus, would including several traces from one part of the > > >plane, across the split, to another area of the plane be helpful > > in reducing > > >the negative effects of the split? In theory, this would provide a > > >continuous path for the return currents on that plane that is > > more closely > > >coupled to the signals than would otherwise result. This should > > then provide > > >some benefit. > > > > > >Brad > > >**************************** > > >Brad Crowell, P. Eng. > > >Senior Hardware Designer > > >AMIRIX Systems > > >Phone: 902-450-1700 Ext 287 > > >Fax: 902-450-1704 > > >www.amirix.com > > >**************************** > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chris Cheng > > > > Sent: January 20, 2005 8:14 PM > > > > Cc: Si-List > > > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: risetime effects of plane breaks > > > > > > > > > > > > Scott, > > > > Excellent summary. That was my concern on striplines crossing > > with a bus > > > > rather than individual signals. In a way, it is like wire bond > > > > signal leads > > > > without the ground leads mixed among them. The signals start > > referencing > > > > each other instead. Or you can see it as a trade-off between adding > > > > shielding layers or spreading the bus spacing (decreasing routing > > > > channels) > > > > in a high density/performance design. My own rule of thumb is > > > > space them at > > > > least equal or larger than the gap itself when crossing. That's > > > > is at least > > > > a 3x decrease in routing channels so it is quite costly and has > > > > to be weight > > > > against adding shielding layers. Sometimes its worth it, > > > > sometimes its not. > > > > As for EMI, if you dig back some discussion I had with Steve, I always > > > > prefer solid ground planes referencing microstrips on top and > > > > bottom of PCB > > > > and then stitch the edges with ground vias. Hopefully any of > > those excited > > > > noise on the cut power planes will be trapped inside. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:39 PM > > > > Cc: Si-List > > > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: risetime effects of plane breaks > > > > > > > > > > > > When this thread started I was on vacation. However, I found this > > > > interesting enough to resurrect some previous simulations I'd > > performed > > > > in CST Microwave Studio. After much playing, twiddling and generally > > > > having fun I can say several things: > > > > 1) It's pretty easy to confirm Doug's results using 3D fullwave > > > > simulation. In fact, in about 30 minutes I can replicate his case and > > > > create a design that can be easily modified for many other > > > > possibilites. The microstrip split plane crossing is a no-brainer. > > > > Just don't do it and expect anything approaching an EMI > > "clean" system. > > > > > > > > 2) Chris and Steve ... and eventually myself, wanted to know > > more about > > > > the various different stripline plane crossing configurations, so I > > > > setup a simulation with a VDD island not unlike what might be > > found in a > > > > memory system, and performed multiple simulations with dual > > asymmeteric > > > > stripline crossing the plane twice on it's way to the memory > > module. Not > > > > surprisingly the following is true: > > > > > > > > It is best not to cross a split plane ... even with stripline. > > > > If you do, it is better to cross a split that is adjacent to a > > > > ground plane > > > > It is even better if you cross a split adjacent to a > > ground plane on > > > > the stripline layer furthest away from the split plane > > (i.e. next to > > > > a ground plane) > > > > It is worst to cross a split plane that has no adjacent ground. > > > > The width of the gap in the plane makes very little > > difference until > > > > it becomes really small or really big. > > > > Crosstalk scales almost linearly with the number of aggressors > > > > crossing the split. (i.e. - it can get really bad!) > > > > Bypass of the split power island helps for frequencies below 500 > > > > MHz, provides no help for frequencies higher than 500 MHz, and as > > > > such has no benefit to most of the noise and crosstalk created by > > > > high speed signals crossing onto and off of the island. > > > > > > > > The energy released into the power/ground plane cavities by high speed > > > > signal split plane crossings is huge and essentially cannot be > > > > suppressed with bypass capacitors. Any attempt at supprerssion with > > > > capacitors exhibits what I call a "Whack-A-Mole" property. You can > > > > never get rid of those pesky little moles. All you can do is to move > > > > them around by thumping them. Given that all this energy is rattling > > > > around the PCB power planes from split plane crossings, it will > > > > eventually go somewhere. Since it's really easy to develop > > all sorts of > > > > resonant power island cavities that have primary resonant > > frequencies in > > > > the 500 MHz to several GHz range, it is not at all unlikely that any > > > > split plane crossing has an extremely strong potential to excite a > > > > resonance in a frequency range that will cause most systems > > to fail EMC > > > > compliance testing About all you can do is to shield the > > cavity patches > > > > using ground layers. This should reduce the radiated energy > > > > significantly, but will not totally eliminate it, since eventually it > > > > will find it's way to all those pesky device and package leads. > > > > > > > > > > > > best regards, > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Scott McMorrow > > > > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > > > > 121 North River Drive > > > > Narragansett, RI 02882 > > > > (401) 284-1827 Business > > > > (401) 284-1840 Fax > > > > > > > > http://www.teraspeed.com > > > > > > > > Teraspeed is the registered service mark of > > > > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > > > > > For help: > > > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > > > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > > > > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > > > http://www.si-list.org > > > > > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > > > or at our remote archives: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > > > > > For help: > > > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > > > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > > > > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > > > http://www.si-list.org > > > > > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > > > or at our remote archives: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >To unsubscribe from si-list: > > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > > >For help: > > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > >List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > > > > >List technical documents are available at: > > > http://www.si-list.org > > > > > >List archives are viewable at: > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > >or at our remote archives: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.org > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > or at our remote archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu