[SI-LIST] Re: risetime effects of plane breaks

  • From: "Brad Crowell" <brad.crowell@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <weirsp@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Si-List" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:22:30 -0400

Yes, that is what I am suggesting. This would probably be a closer analogy
to a board to board connector than IC bond wires, as the physical scale
would be closer to the connector situation.

Brad

> -----Original Message-----
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of steve weir
> Sent: January 21, 2005 9:06 AM
> To: brad.crowell@xxxxxxxxxx; Si-List
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: risetime effects of plane breaks
>
>
> Brad, are you proposing parallel tracks on the signal layer
> interdigitated
> 1:N signal traces that extend completely across an island?
>
> Steve
> At 08:50 AM 1/21/2005 -0400, Brad Crowell wrote:
> >Chris's analogy to wire bonding makes me wonder if this would be
> helpful in
> >crossing splits. Assuming one can't avoid it and has to cross a
> plane split
> >with a bus, would including several traces from one part of the
> >plane, across the split, to another area of the plane be helpful
> in reducing
> >the negative effects of the split? In theory, this would provide a
> >continuous path for the return currents on that plane that is
> more closely
> >coupled to the signals than would otherwise result. This should
> then provide
> >some benefit.
> >
> >Brad
> >****************************
> >Brad Crowell, P. Eng.
> >Senior Hardware Designer
> >AMIRIX Systems
> >Phone: 902-450-1700 Ext 287
> >Fax: 902-450-1704
> >www.amirix.com
> >****************************
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chris Cheng
> > > Sent: January 20, 2005 8:14 PM
> > > Cc: Si-List
> > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: risetime effects of plane breaks
> > >
> > >
> > > Scott,
> > > Excellent summary. That was my concern on striplines crossing
> with a bus
> > > rather than individual signals. In a way, it is like wire bond
> > > signal leads
> > > without the ground leads mixed among them. The signals start
> referencing
> > > each other instead. Or you can see it as a trade-off between adding
> > > shielding layers or spreading the bus spacing (decreasing routing
> > > channels)
> > > in a high density/performance design. My own rule of thumb is
> > > space them at
> > > least equal or larger than the gap itself when crossing. That's
> > > is at least
> > > a 3x decrease in routing channels so it is quite costly and has
> > > to be weight
> > > against adding shielding layers. Sometimes its worth it,
> > > sometimes its not.
> > > As for EMI, if you dig back some discussion I had with Steve, I always
> > > prefer solid ground planes referencing microstrips on top and
> > > bottom of PCB
> > > and then stitch the edges with ground vias. Hopefully any of
> those excited
> > > noise on the cut power planes will be trapped inside.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:39 PM
> > > Cc: Si-List
> > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: risetime effects of plane breaks
> > >
> > >
> > > When this thread started I was on vacation.  However, I found this
> > > interesting enough to resurrect some previous simulations I'd
> performed
> > > in CST Microwave Studio.  After much playing, twiddling and generally
> > > having fun I can say several things:
> > > 1) It's pretty easy to confirm Doug's results using 3D fullwave
> > > simulation. In fact, in about 30 minutes I can replicate his case and
> > > create a design that can be easily modified for many other
> > > possibilites.  The microstrip split plane crossing is a no-brainer.
> > > Just don't do it and expect anything approaching an EMI
> "clean" system.
> > >
> > > 2) Chris and Steve ... and eventually myself, wanted to know
> more about
> > > the various different stripline plane crossing configurations, so I
> > > setup a simulation with a VDD island not unlike what might be
> found in a
> > > memory system, and performed multiple simulations with dual
> asymmeteric
> > > stripline crossing the plane twice on it's way to the memory
> module. Not
> > > surprisingly the following is true:
> > >
> > >     It is best not to cross a split plane ... even with stripline.
> > >     If you do, it is better to cross a split that is adjacent to a
> > >     ground plane
> > >     It is even better if you cross a split adjacent to a
> ground plane on
> > >     the stripline layer furthest away from the split plane
> (i.e. next to
> > >     a ground plane)
> > >     It is worst to cross a split plane that has no adjacent ground.
> > >     The width of the gap in the plane makes very little
> difference until
> > >     it becomes really small or really big.
> > >     Crosstalk scales almost linearly with the number of aggressors
> > >     crossing the split. (i.e. - it can get really bad!)
> > >     Bypass of the split power island helps for frequencies below 500
> > >     MHz, provides no help for frequencies higher than 500 MHz, and as
> > >     such has no benefit to most of the noise and crosstalk created by
> > >     high speed signals crossing onto and off of the island.
> > >
> > > The energy released into the power/ground plane cavities by high speed
> > > signal split plane crossings is huge and essentially cannot be
> > > suppressed with bypass capacitors.  Any attempt at supprerssion with
> > > capacitors exhibits what I call a "Whack-A-Mole" property.  You can
> > > never get rid of those pesky little moles. All you can do is to move
> > > them around by thumping them. Given that all this energy is rattling
> > > around the PCB power planes from split plane crossings, it will
> > > eventually go somewhere.  Since it's really easy to develop
> all sorts of
> > > resonant power island cavities that have primary resonant
> frequencies in
> > > the 500 MHz to several GHz range, it is not at all unlikely that any
> > > split plane crossing has an extremely strong potential to excite a
> > > resonance in a frequency range that will cause most systems
> to fail EMC
> > > compliance testing  About all you can do is to shield the
> cavity patches
> > > using ground layers.  This should reduce the radiated energy
> > > significantly, but will not totally eliminate it, since eventually it
> > > will find it's way to all those pesky device and package leads.
> > >
> > >
> > > best regards,
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > --
> > > Scott McMorrow
> > > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
> > > 121 North River Drive
> > > Narragansett, RI 02882
> > > (401) 284-1827 Business
> > > (401) 284-1840 Fax
> > >
> > > http://www.teraspeed.com
> > >
> > > Teraspeed is the registered service mark of
> > > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> > >
> > > For help:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > >                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> > >
> > > List technical documents are available at:
> > >                 http://www.si-list.org
> > >
> > > List archives are viewable at:
> > >               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > > or at our remote archives:
> > >               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > >               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> > >
> > > For help:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > >                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> > >
> > > List technical documents are available at:
> > >                 http://www.si-list.org
> > >
> > > List archives are viewable at:
> > >               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > > or at our remote archives:
> > >               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > >               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> >For help:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> >List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> >                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >
> >List technical documents are available at:
> >                 http://www.si-list.org
> >
> >List archives are viewable at:
> >                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >or at our remote archives:
> >                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
>                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
> List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
>               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
>               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: