[SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- From: Zhiping Yang <zhiping@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:13:17 -0700
Hi Steve,
You are right. I should use available or effective capacitance in my statement.
I definitely agree that the board stackup is critical in high speed design.
Thanks.
Actually this is also the reason behind my suggestion #3. At high
frequency(>400Mhz),
the local decoupling capacitor will not be effective anymore. The build-in
capacitance between PWR and GND provides most transite current at high
frequency,
so it is better that the vias directly connect PWR/GND pins to PWR/GND planes.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Zhiping
Zhiping
"S. Weir" wrote:
> Zhiping, I would rephrase your statement to read "the goal is to minimize
> the total loop inductance between the IC and the available
> capacitance". Assuming power / gnd planes, the via and pad pattern of the
> capacitor together with which surface it is on, and the board stackup
> become dominant contributors to the inductance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve.
> At 10:46 AM 7/19/01 -0700, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Here is my $0.02 input.
> >
> >Where to put the decoupling caps is a complicated problem.
> >The PCB stackup is a big factor to consider. No matter where
> >you put it, the goal is to minimize the total loop inductance
> >between IC and caps.
> >
> >Here is what I would recommend:
> >1. If you can place IC and caps pretty near each other, then
> >placing them on the same side is better than the opposite side.
> >2. If IC and caps are on the same side and the power layer is near IC,
> >then it's better to place cap near GND pin. If the ground layer is
> >near IC, then it is better to place cap near power pin. Here is a plot
> >of suggested placement
> >
> > - IC - -cap-
> > | | | |
> >--*----------*------- GND
> > | |
> >------*--*-----------PWR
> >
> >3. I would recommend to connect IC and cap PWR/GND pins directly
> >to PWR/GND layer through vias.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >johnni.friis@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks
> > >
> > > Where do you place the caps ?
> > > The caps and the IC is on the side of the PCB, or ?
> > >
> > > 1. Close to Vcc pin
> > > The GND connection of the IC and the cap are made directly to GND-plane=
> > > .
> > > The Vcc connection is made from Vcc pin to cap to via plane. (See below=
> > > ).
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Vcc pin o-----| |----o via to Vcc plane
> > > |cap|
> > > |___|-----o via to Gnd plane
> > >
> > > 2. Close to GND pin
> > > The Vcc connection of the IC and the cap are made directly to Vcc-plane=
> > > .
> > > The GND connection is made from GND pin to cap to via to plane. (See
> > > below).
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Gnd pin o-----| |----o via to Gnd plane
> > > |cap|
> > > |___|-----o via to Vcc plane
> > >
> > > Some say 2 is best. The current from cap to IC will generate a noise
> > > voltage in the plane (1. in GND-plane and 2. in Vcc-plane).
> > > It's best to have the noise in Vcc-plane.
> > > (Our baords is 4 layers, plane seperation of 1 mm (40 mill), F=3D40 M=
> > > Hz,
> > > singel ended signals, tr/tf ~ 1nS. )
> > > What do you think ?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Johnni Friis
> > > G=E5sdal Bygningsindustri A/S
> > > Decoration & Sunscreening, Electrics and Shutters
> > > B=E6kg=E5rdsvej 40
> > > DK 6900 Skjern
> > > E-mail: johnni.friis@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Phone +45 9980 6666
> > > Fax +45 9980 6260=
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> > > For help:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > List archives are viewable at:
> > > http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > > or at our remote archives:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > >
> >
> >--
> > Zhiping Yang, Ph. D.
> > Hardware Engineer
> > Cisco Systems
> > 270 West Tasman Drive
> > Mail Stop:SJCG/2/2
> > San Jose, CA 95134 | |
> > email: zhiping@xxxxxxxxx :|: :|:
> > Tel : 408 525 5690 :|||: :|||:
> > Fax : 408 526 5504 .:|||||||:..:|||||||:.
> >*****************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >For help:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> >List archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >or at our remote archives:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- From: S. Weir
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- » [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- From: S. Weir