[SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- From: yan hang <yang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:31:47 +0800
Hello Lynne & Michael ,
In the "IBIS QUALITY SPECIFICATION ", it defined that the IQ3=20
level--the model data for timing analysis has been checked. If there is =
a
time of offset between
the two waveforms(IBIS &HSPICE),shoule we say the model can not pass the
IQ3?
When we use hspice model to create ibis model ,do we must check the =
offset
and correct it?
Best Regards,
Yan Hang
Huawei Technology
Shanghai Research Institute
Interconnection Dept.,R&D
Tel =A3=AB862168644808=A3=AD24043
-----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE-----
=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Lynne D. Green [mailto:lgreen22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20
=B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2006=C4=EA11=D4=C218=C8=D5 3:36
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: forsilist@xxxxxxxxx; yang@xxxxxxxxxx; =
si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=B3=AD=CB=CD: liuweidong@xxxxxxxxxx
=D6=F7=CC=E2: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
Hello, Yan Hang,
IBIS and SPICE do not have the same Time=3D0 reference, due to the way =
SI
tools trigger I/O inputs. This means that there is a time offset =
between
the two waveforms.
This offset can be corrected for by simulating the load [Vmeas, Rref, =
Cref].
This delay offset can then be used to adjust the delay in other =
simulations.
Many SI tools have automated this process.
A good paper on this is http://pcdandm.com/cms/content/view/2800/95/. =
There
is also a HyperLynx Application Note, referenced in that paper.
Best regards,
Lynne
"IBIS training when you need it, where you need it."
Dr. Lynne Green
Green Streak Programs
http://www.greenstreakprograms.com
425-788-0412
lgreen22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] =
On
Behalf Of raj singh
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:34 AM
To: yang@xxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: liuweidong@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
Hspice delays should be accurate and in general more than ibis. Better =
to
use ibis only for SI sims and not for timing.
=20
regards
Raj
yan hang <yang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
=20
Hi All,
Now I do some board timing simulations . I got the hspice =3D model and =
ibis
model for same buffer. Then I set a test fixture(Ex.
Cref=3D3D15pf,Rref=3D3D1E6,Vref=3D3D3.3V),I contrast the simulation =
result of =3D
buffer dealy using hspice model and ibis model. I found there is a =
little
big diffrence between them.
So when translate hspice model to ibis model,how to consider about the
buffer deley issue? =3D20 Should I trust the buffer delay value from =
ibis
model =3D simulation?
Best Regards.
Yan Hang
Huawei Technology
086-21=3DA3=3DAD68644808=3DA3=3DAD24043
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- From: Lynne D. Green
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- From: Lynne D. Green
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- From: Lynne D. Green
- [SI-LIST] Re: Buffer delay
- From: Lynne D. Green