David, 35mm film is usually made from 35mm cine film stock. I was responding to your assumptions, not someone else's post. This is the end of my discussion. FINITO! Jerry David Sadowski wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:David, No, you suggest erroneously! My 828 negatives are considerably thinner than my 35mm negs taken in the same time frame. My 828 negs were taken with a Kodak Bantam Special a Kodak Medalist and a Rolleiflex. (Both the latter with adapters made by my cousin) I do know the difference between roll film stock and cine film stock. Thanks, JerryFYI, I made no reference to cine film in any of my posts. You must be responding to someone else's post. --- Rollei List
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
