[rollei_list] Re: [rolleiusers] Argomania
- From: Allen Zak <azak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:12:07 -0500
On Jan 11, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Don Williams wrote:
At 02:10 AM 1/11/2010, you wrote:
Yup
That pretty much sez it all. I like to think that without Argus's
ability to dump truly affordable 35mm cameras on the market we might
not have had 35mm as the dominant format. Perhaps 126 would have won
out or a totally new film format might have been created.
Javier
What was the sprocket-less format Kodak had at the time, 828 or
something like that?
DAW
Yes, it was, later morphed into 126 film by virtue of being punched at
the edge for interval stops and stuffed into a cartridge. That's how
Kodak extended its production life.
Allen Zak
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
