[rollei_list] Re: are there more than one kind of Bay-II?
- From: Marc James Small <msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:10:14 -0400
At 03:43 PM 8/13/06 -0700, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
>
>No, no Todd. 2.8A lenshoods will not properly index on a 42mm
>or 45mm spaced f3.5 camera or vice versa. Filters will, of course.
>
>No one has ever seen a 2.8A lenshood with a bayonet marking.
Jerry
I just sold a 2.8A lenshood. As you note, it was marked only with the F&H
logo and "2.8A" -- at that time, F&H only sold "Bayonet" accessories and
"2.8A" accessories. It was not until the advent of the later 3.5C that the
term "Bayonet II" was adopted I have always understood that the 2.8A used
what later came to be known as the Bayonet II mounting, but canted, as the
Baby Grey Bayonet I hoods are canted from those used on Rolleiflex and
Rollecord cameras.
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
