[rollei_list] Re: Tell the tales of Triotars

  • From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 09:41:16 -0700


----- Original Message ----- From: "Sanders McNew" <sanders@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 12:26 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Tell the tales of Triotars


Apart from the obvious difference in aperture, can anyone speak to the differences (if any) between the f/3.8 and f/4.5 Triotars? Does anyone think they can see any discernible differences in how they render images? The difference in speed seems slight -- why did F+H offer both lenses? Is there any advantage to one over the other?

Sanders McNew

The answer may lie in the cost of the lenses. I suspect the f/3.8 was offered because it was closer to the f/3.5 lens on the Rolleiflex but the Flex originally came with a slower lens. Another possibility is the size of the shutter, the slower lens will fit a smaller shutter. Kodak made the 127mm Ektar as an f/4.7 lens because the iris in the shutter they used would not open wide enough for f/4.5 and did the same thing with an f/3.8 Ektar for press cameras which is essentially the same as the f/3.5 lens in the Medalist camera only slightly longer in focal length and in a standard shutter. Both Tessars and Triplets are best as slower lenses, perhaps around f/6.3. At larger apertures they begin to lose sharpness at the margins of the image. The f/3.5 and f/4.5 lenses are at their best for overall sharpness when stopped down to around f/11. You may know that the Triplet is the simplest lens that can be corrected for all seven primary aberrations. They were difficult lenses to design pre-computer because any change in any parameter affects everything else. They also are very sensitive to element spacing so require precision mounting.

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: