[rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 35mm Cameras
- From: "Marvin" <marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:40:24 +0800
Yes my experience is based on the one experience. Incidentally I also used
the Contax turret finder once and didn't get on with that either.
I knew that it is much better to use a m with frame lines.
As Hauke pointed out the original discussion was about the Rollei 35, yours
was the post in which the camera became a "modified version" with the hot
shoe rf at the bottom- as impractical as that may be.
In sum if hot shoe rf are the best go for it. I won't be buying one nor
losing sleep about not having one.
I trust you do know what you're talking about, I'm not that bothered though.
Marvin.
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Goldstein
Sent: 12 November 2009 10:08
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 35mm Cameras
So all of your voluminous opinions about aux rangefinders are based on a
single experience...
Eric Goldstein
--
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Marvin <marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I had a Leica rf. It was so cumbersome that I just reverted to using an M3.
Eye on eye of the subject was simply tedious. Other than that I have never
bothered, to go with the hot shoe rf appendage since it's not necessary, I
figure much superior design compromises are available, built in rf. Though
I am tempted to buy a 4x5 Polaroid with a hot shoe rf.
Marvin.
-----Original Message-----
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Goldstein
Sent: 12 November 2009 09:53
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 35mm Cameras
OK, let's have a little reality check here... have you ever used an
aux rangefinder? If so, which ones? On which cameras?
Eric Goldstein
--
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Marvin <marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But better that using a hot shoe rf, a good quality built in rf such as
the
> contax II is far superior, and less cumbersome.
> Marvin.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
<//www.freelists.org/>
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
<//www.freelists.org/>
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
<//www.freelists.org/>
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
<//www.freelists.org/>
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
