So all of your voluminous opinions about aux rangefinders are based on a single experience... Eric Goldstein -- On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Marvin <marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I had a Leica rf. It was so cumbersome that I just reverted to using an M3. > Eye on eye of the subject was simply tedious. Other than that I have never > bothered, to go with the hot shoe rf appendage since it's not necessary, I > figure much superior design compromises are available, built in rf. Though > I am tempted to buy a 4x5 Polaroid with a hot shoe rf. > Marvin. > > -----Original Message----- > From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Goldstein > Sent: 12 November 2009 09:53 > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 35mm Cameras > > OK, let's have a little reality check here... have you ever used an > aux rangefinder? If so, which ones? On which cameras? > > > Eric Goldstein > > -- > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Marvin <marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But better that using a hot shoe rf, a good quality built in rf such as > the > > contax II is far superior, and less cumbersome. > > Marvin. > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > >