Welldone Mark looks great. The Voitlander lens looks impressive was it the Skopar. Marvin. -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Rabiner Sent: 10 November 2009 12:58 To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 35mm Cameras > Easy answers here... first off, it is not correct that a built-in > rangefinder is more accurate. Secondly, the Rollei 35 was unusually > compact (for its time) in part because is did not have a rangefinder, > and as we have discussed here, for the majority of shooting > situations, a rangefinder is not needed... > > > Eric Goldstein I had a piece of 3 foot string on mine half the time. I did a lot of shots right at 3 feet. Often cropping later. F 3 feet and be here. I found my guest to matic 3 foot abilities in need of finite help. There were some shots I really wanted to make sure came out (pretty girls?) 3 feet is an allusive distance. Its always what you don't think. Mark William Rabiner --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list