Marc, Since you made a remark alluding to my age, I would like to inform you that I just went back to work the day after my 77th birthday. Same job in Aerospace Engineering. Jerry Marc James Small wrote: > Hmm. I'm a friend of John Forester, the fellow who wrote a number of books > and articles around 1980 which revived interest in serious bicycling. > (John is the son of CS Forester, the creator of Horatio Hornblower, but, to > my fairly certain knowledge, neither John nor his father nor, for that > matter, Horatio Hornblower ever used a Rolleiflex camera.) > > A good basic bicycle has been available in the US for the past thirty years > which is light of weight, capable of rough service, and realtively easy to > use. This came about when frames started being made from aluminium alloys > instead of from steel or, in Jerry Lehrer's youth, wood. <he grins> It > took the Japanese thirty years to learn how to get the stuff right, but > Japanese gear clusters and brakes and shifters built since 1980 or so have > been first-rate. If I were seriously into bike-racing, yes, the best is > worth it, and those European fiber-frames and the like are worth the > funds, as are tube tyres and all the rest. But for simply puttering down > to the market, a solid bike can be had for not a lot of money. Get a > 10-speed or better and get toe clips, but much of the rest is so much > nonsense. > > I rode regularly until 1997 or so. About two years back, I dug my bike out > and inflated the tires and went off to ride it. I fell off three times, > proving that you CAN forget how to ride a bicycle! I then spent hours in > my back yard, relearning the intricacies of balance and so forth. And > then, just when I had it all in hand, my Physical Therapists told me NEVER > to ride a bike again due to my bad knee, so there it goes. > > But a solid and decent bike can be had at a decent price in the US, and a > REALLY good bike can be had for a LOT of money, on par or more with the > forthcoming Leica Digital M. But the most of us would not be able to > appreciate the difference. From years in the darkroom, I do know the > difference between a Rolleiflex or a Leica and a more plebian type, but I'm > not sophisticated sufficiently in bicycles to note the differences with > increasing levels of quality. Now, for kayaks, I'm a Klepper guy, but that > is a tale for a different day. > > Marc > > msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.0.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/357 - Release Date: 06/06/2006 --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list