[rollei_list] Re: OFF-TOPIC - Bicycles

  • From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 18:54:48 -0700

Marc,

Since you made a remark alluding to my age, I would like to inform you that I
just  went back to work the day after my 77th birthday.  Same job in Aerospace
Engineering.

Jerry

Marc James Small wrote:

> Hmm.  I'm a friend of John Forester, the fellow who wrote a number of books
> and articles around 1980 which revived interest in serious bicycling.
> (John is the son of CS Forester, the creator of Horatio Hornblower, but, to
> my fairly certain knowledge, neither John nor his father nor, for that
> matter, Horatio Hornblower ever used a Rolleiflex camera.)
>
> A good basic bicycle has been available in the US for the past thirty years
> which is light of weight, capable of rough service, and realtively easy to
> use.  This came about when frames started being made from aluminium alloys
> instead of from steel or, in Jerry Lehrer's youth, wood.  <he grins>  It
> took the Japanese thirty years to learn how to get the stuff right, but
> Japanese gear clusters and brakes and shifters built since 1980 or so have
> been first-rate.  If I were seriously into bike-racing, yes, the best is
> worth it, and  those European fiber-frames and the like are worth the
> funds, as are tube tyres and all the rest.  But for simply puttering down
> to the market, a solid bike can be had for not a lot of money.  Get a
> 10-speed or better and get toe clips, but much of the rest is so much
> nonsense.
>
> I rode regularly until 1997 or so.  About two years back, I dug my bike out
> and inflated the tires and went off to ride it.  I fell off three times,
> proving that you CAN forget how to ride a bicycle!  I then spent hours in
> my back yard, relearning the intricacies of balance and so forth.  And
> then, just when I had it all in hand, my Physical Therapists told me NEVER
> to ride a bike again due to my bad knee, so there it goes.
>
> But a solid and decent bike can be had at a decent price in the US, and a
> REALLY good bike can be had for a LOT of money, on par or more with the
> forthcoming Leica Digital M.  But the most of us would not be able to
> appreciate the difference.  From years in the darkroom, I do know the
> difference between a Rolleiflex or a Leica and a more plebian type, but I'm
> not sophisticated sufficiently in bicycles to note the differences with
> increasing levels of quality.  Now, for kayaks, I'm a Klepper guy, but that
> is a tale for a different day.
>
> Marc
>
> msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.0.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/357 - Release Date: 06/06/2006

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: