Hi Charlie, I take your word for it, and respect your opinion on it. I will say that I know a LOT of "professionals" who are more so advanced amateurs than professionals. Most wedding photographers are more so advanced amateurs, though they are technically professionals, as they make money from it. So, I'm not personally sure how to distinguish the difference. Did you sell both Hasselblads and Rollei TLRs? If so, did most people interested in one, also show interest in the other? What can you say about the relationship between the two, with respect to the customer? Regards, Austin -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Newhouse230@xxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:51 PM To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Decline of Rollieflex/Film Austin..I am not claiming for one minute that my either opinion is based on science. Most people who worked in small to mid-size retail camera stores of 'that time' got to know their customers. It's not like it is today! You there a LOT of 'regulars' and you did know if they were amateur or pro. There were, of course, many 'walk-ins' too, but when you spent a half hour or an hour with them showing them cameras (as retailers DID commonly do then) the depth of their knowledge and their 'use' for the Rollei quickly became apparent. So, yes, I think that in the vast majority of cases I could tell if the customer buying a Rollei was an 'advanced amateur' or a pro. Charlie In a message dated 3/25/2010 4:43:56 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: Hi Charlie, Perhaps, but how could you tell if someone was a professional or "advanced amateur"? I don't recall anyone ever asking me that question, nor me ever telling them. And, I've bought a whole lot of cameras. Plus, your isolated observation, no matter how true, does not speak for the whole world's market. Regards, Austin -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Newhouse230@xxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:33 PM To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Decline of Rollieflex/Film Hi Austin, I worked in camera stores in the late 50's and early 60's and saw who was buying Rolleis; There were simply a lot more advanced amateurs than pros. I base it on observation/recollection. In the 60's when I studied photojournalism in college, the market had already swung to 35mm! Regards, Charlie In a message dated 3/25/2010 4:14:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: Hi Charlie, I'm curious how you know that to be true. Regards, Austin -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Newhouse230@xxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:01 PM To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Decline of Rollieflex/Film Yes, there were a lot of photojournalists who used them, but their numbers were dwarfed by the number of 'advanced amateurs'! charlie silverman In a message dated 3/25/2010 2:11:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, peterk727@xxxxxxxxx writes: I guess all the Photojournalists who used them for their day to day work did not know they were amateurs. :-) On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Elias_Roustom <elroustom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Rollei TLR cameras were cameras for the advanced amateur market mainly Now that I didn't know. That's really interesting. Old news for you, news to me. Adds to the mystique. Thanks. --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list