Greetings Chris; I have been a ' Tri-X ' user for many , many years, The 400 Tri-x is basically an amateur emulsion, good but the 320 is the ' Pro ' film has a much better sensitivity curve AND has been the stock film for Professionals world wide for years. Being an 'Old ' type emulsion it has a lot going for it , in my view it is worth making ONE of your standard film types. Cheers BarrieB. At 07:05 AM 15/02/2005, you wrote: >In my quest to find my film of choice and after comparing Tmax 400 with TriX >I plumped on TriX. I then downloaded the latest Kodak datasheets and found >to my amazement, two Tri X emulsions, TriX 400 and 320, which are available >in different formats. I cannot begin to understand the weird reasoning >behind this but would welcome any observations between the two emulsions. > >It would also seem that TriX 400 is not available in 5x4! > >-- >Regards Chris Woodhouse > > > >============================================================================================================= >To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your >account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you >subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- barrieb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx{ Melbourne , Australia } ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.