From: titrisol <titrisol@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Personal Dev Times Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:46:13 -0700 (PDT) > I prefer a shotgun approach > Shoot a roll -2,-1,0,+1,+2 develop at a given time/temp > then try making prints and see which one looks "normal" > with a 2 or 3 filter in the enlarger. > From there I choose my personal EI or go another iteration to > achieve the result I want. The part that affects contrast is development time and temperature. With negative emulsions, exposure error within one stop is unimportant because negatives are developed to such a low contrast and the image contrast is boosted at the time of printing. Therefore it is perfectly acceptable to shoot at the box speed, or maybe half the box speed, and adjust the development time to print well on grade 2 paper. In the old days of APX25 and Panatomic-X, this may be different, but today's very fine grain and very high resolution medium speed films are coated in 2 layers. The top layer is a blend of faster emulsions, and the bottom is a blend of slower ones. The bottom emulsion is there to decrease the loss of resolution by light scattering, and also prevent the granularity to increase by "filling in" between large grains in the top layer. It's really a well designed system that increases exposure latitude without sacrificing resolution or granularity. There is not much to gain from spending time in fine-tuning exposure with today's excellent films like T-MAX 100 and Acros. I still have a brick of APX25 but I prefer Acros to APX25, as well (besides the bubble problem of Acros). ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.