I would suggest that it has to do with your target market. There are studios here in Dallas, that charge a sitting fee which includes 1) 8x10 finished print - that means mounted with an over matte, but no frame for $750.00. That might include 10 to 15 rolls of medium format shots; extra prints start at $250.00 and the sky is the limit. If you are looking for pricing guidance, check with the PPA or similar organization. I believe that you can pretty much get away with what ever the customer thinks you are worth. There are wedding photographers that pull in a whopping $5,000 to $10,000 per weeding! I can't believe that people would pay that, but for some that is nothing. The brides are putting on $15,000 dresses. It is SICK! But hey, that is just me. What some people spend on a wedding an entire village could eat WELL for a year. OK, OK, I am dismounting my high horse. But... a reasonable fee which includes a print or two that is hand crafted is not much to ask. If you look at it in an hourly sense, a courier service is less than $150.00/hr, a clerk to file paper work and book appointments does not make 150 to 200/hr. There are certainly aspects of the shoot that cost a lot, and some that don't. Is your product a quick print from a drug store or a finely finished work, dare I say it, of ART? 40/hr is still a good living wage if that is after all your taxes, etc. It is not top wages, but not every one gets overly compensated like the CEO at Exxon : ) It is after all, just a portrait right. Ok, ok. Good luck Eric Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net http://ericneilsenphotography.com > -----Original Message----- > From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver- > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Justin F. Knotzke > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 8:23 AM > To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Fees > > <quote who=Gianni Rondinini] date=[20/04/2006 09:06/> > > > uhm, i realize my mail sounds a bit rude. disregard it. > > > > read that this way: 200usd/hour is a big lot of money, anything you > > may be talking about [1], and expecially if you go on charging for > > prints and films, too. i don't know of any "common" photographer > > taking that money. i think that making your customers pay for film and > > prints *and* some extra for your time is ok, but 150/200usd seems me > > really too much. > > The rate includes film and development. > > I recently did a studio shoot. I only charged for materials. My time > was free. > > It cost the client $220 just in film, studio and development. No > prints. > > Add in 3hrs of my time in the studio, plus say 2hrs for development > time plus the time it took to rent the studio, go to the colour lab > twice.. Figure another hour of my time. That's six hours total. > > At $150 an hour x 3 hrs = $450 charged to the client. > > $450 - $220 (film and dev) = $230 > > $230 / 6hrs = $40/h > > I'd say I'm pretty cheap. That doesn't include the cost of my > equipment and the usual hassles of dealing with 6 primadonnas. > > J > > -- > Justin F. Knotzke > jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.shampoo.ca > ========================================================================== > =================================== > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.