On 15 February 2010 15:34, Sam Seaver <samseaver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, <pamail.cgi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The following was sent from the Editor's Companion form > > From: Timothy Pederick <pederick@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: 07:14:37 on Monday, February 15, 2010 > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > (er) 04wotw 282: his lean, haggard, and dangerous blue eyes -> his lean, > haggard face and dangerous blue eyes [tp: unless someone can tell me how > eyes can be lean and haggard?] > > > > I'd accept haggard for eyes, but lean is pushing it in my opinion > Yeah, I was being a bit hyperbolic -- 'lean' or 'haggard' could be poetically applied to eyes, just like 'dangerous' is -- but stringing all three together read really wrongly to me. But 'face' fits both adjectives, and the context, perfectly well. It looks even more like a simple missing word when you drop the serial comma that PA added. :-) -- Tim Pederick