>(er) 16tlov 343: your sixth sense -> your Sixth Sense [KS: Yes, no, maybe. >. . I don't know.] >(er) 16tlov 338: your sixth sense warns -> your Sixth Sense warns [KS: Yes, >no, maybe?] I'd say yes on this one, myself. >(er) 16tlov 342: insignia identify him -> insignia identifies him Disagree. Insignia in English is both the singular and plural. ("Insignias" as the plural is also accepted; the Latin-correct singular "insigne" is just for pedants like me.) >(er) 16tlov 341: towards the north-east. -> towards the northeast. [KS: >Just suggesting. . .] >(er) 16tlov 341: a north-easterly route -> a northeasterly route [KS: >Again, not sure on this one.] The first looks okay either way, but the second I think definitely looks better hyphenated. So I'd go for hyphenating both, to be consistent. >(er) 16tlov 339: first-floor ruins -> first floor ruins Not according to the PAMoS. >(er) 16tlov 319: rank of Kai Grand Mastership, -> rank of Kai mastery, >[KS: I can't think of anywhere else that a choice was phrased that way, >does this seem odd to anyone else? Everything else I saw was Kai mastery.] Perhaps "Kai Grand Mastery"? >(er) 16tlov 319: without trace. -> without a trace. [KS: Never heard it >that way before. Could be me. . .] I have, I think, but either way sounds okay to me (yours is the more common). >(er) 16tlov 315: the king's death -> the King's death [KS: Important office >title capitalized here?] Well now, that depends. Are we referring to "the King" -- THE King -- or are we referring to "the king, this king, a king"? It's a fine distinction really. At least one manual of style I've read suggests capitalising titles either on first reference or as part of a name (since the first reference is itself a sort of name -- later references act as identifiers that refer back to it, sort of like pronouns and antecedents). Errm, the upshot of that is, I think it should stay uncapitalised here, as it was capitalised in "King Vanagrom VI". >(er) 16tlov 314: Elder is wide-eyed -> Elder is wide eyed [KS: Not sure if >the hyphen rule applies to this one or not.] Hmm, yeah, that's tricky. The PAMoS is plain, but my instinct is to break the rule on this one. -- Tim Pederick