[projectaon] Editor's Companion Submission

The following was sent from the Project Aon contact form
   From: Jon Blake <jonblake@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: 16:12:31 on Saturday, January 1, 2005
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(??) 04wotw 223 #1:  [jb: I think the phrase "that speed ..." modifies 
"denizens" rather than "onslaught". Basically, you must survive the onslaught 
of those denizens who are coming for you, rather than the idea of surviving the 
denizen's onslaught that rushes toward you. So, "speed".]
(??) 04wotw 221 #1:  [jb: In this instance, I believe that it is more 
appropriate for the javelins to arc as individuals rather than the volley 
itself arcing. Very subjective in this case, but it is legal to have a group 
subject use a plural verb when acting as individuals. Very subjective. So, 
"arc"]
(??) 04wotw 217 #2:  [jb: Agreed, "enchantment".]
(??) 04wotw 216 #1:  [jb: I think this is strange enough that I vote for 
"pupil-less".]
(??) 04wotw 191 #1:  [jb: Talks, like, William,... Shatner.]
(??) 04wotw 184 #1:  [jb: Apparently either use is OK. 
<http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spiral> The rules that I learned as a 
wee lad make me think the original "ll" version is preferable.]
(??) 04wotw 180 #1:  [jb: Again, I assume that we want to change this to 
"death-blow". Is there an error in the scripts that I need to fix?]
(??) 04wotw 142 #2:  [jb: I don't see a need to change this one.]
(??) 04wotw 108 #1:  [jb: I'm not currently somewhere where I can view the 
graph to check, but I assume that there was no mention of which power was used 
when getting to this section. I vote for capitalization.]
(??) 04wotw 99 #1:  [jb: I assume that there was a "fast-flowing" at the other 
end of that arrow. :)]
(??) 04wotw 47 #1:  [jb: I vote for changing it to "Agarashi's" and adding an 
explanatory footnote. Are there any other occurences of this term where this 
tactic would be helpful?]
(??) 04wotw 18 #2:  [jb: The phrase "cognitive powers" is used commonly enough 
that I tend to think that it was used in its mundane, non-capitalized form.]
(??) 04wotw 15 #5:  [jb: I vote for clarifying footnote.]
(??) 04wotw 9 #4:  [jb: It seems that Ian Page made deliberate choices about 
how to order certain choices sometimes seeming to place the rash, bad choices 
first, or I could just be seeing patterns where there are none. If there is no 
such order in this case - I leave that judgment to you - go ahead and reorder 
according to the scheme mentioned by Thomas. So let it be written, so let it be 
done.]
(??) 04wotw equipmnt #4:  [jb: Change "or you do not master" to "or if you have 
not mastered".]
(??) 04wotw powers #17:  [jb: For the footnote, change "currently master" to 
"have currently mastered", "already master" to "have already mastered", and "do 
not master" to "have not mastered".]
(??) 04wotw gamerulz #2:  [jb: I was thinking, we may want to add some 
instructions about how to treat the Wizard's Staff in combat if your WP is at 0 
or below, namely a normal non-magical weapon that has the normal penalty for 
not using the Wizard's Staff.]
(??) 04wotw title #1:  [jb: Make that <cite>]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Other related posts: