[projectaon] Editor's Companion Submission

The following was sent from the Project Aon contact form
   From: Jonathan Blake <jonblake@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: 05:57:31 on Tuesday, February 15, 2005
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(ne) 04wotw 12 #4:  [jb: I think the other proposed corrections would make this 
unnecessary.]
(ne) 04wotw 12:  [jb: Make the last paragraph a <choice/>.]
(??) 04wotw 12 #3:  [jb: Moonstone, deduct -> Moonstone, you may deduct]
(??) 04wotw 12 #3:  [jb: Thaumaturgy, deduct -> Thaumaturgy, you may deduct]
(??) 04wotw gamerulz #8:  [jb: It is implied that you must pick a new COMBAT 
SKILL from the Random Number Table even if have already completed previous one 
or more <cite>World of Lone Wolf</cite> adventures. This conflicts with the 
rules for the <cite>Lone Wolf</cite> books where you carry over your score from 
a previous successfully completed adventure. For the sake of consistency, 
players may wish to carry over their existing score from the last <cite>World 
of Lone Wolf</cite> book they completed.]
(??) 04wotw gamerulz #7:  [jb: The original intent of the author was most 
likely that the player should add 50 to their final WILLPOWER score from the 
end of their last successfully completed <cite>World of Lone Wolf</cite> 
adventure.]
(??) 04wotw gamerulz #6:  [jb: The original intent of the author was most 
likely that the player should add 30 to their final ENDURANCE score from the 
end of their last successfully completed <cite>World of Lone Wolf</cite> 
adventure. In the <cite>Lone Wolf</cite> series, it is standard practice to 
restore one's ENDURANCE points to their original total when carrying them over 
from one adventure to the next, but the power of the Moonstone seems to change 
those rules in this case.]
(??) 04wotw title #2:  [jb: approved]
(??) 04wotw 175 #1:  [jb: I seem to remember that Grey Star the Wizard
had many such situations also. I lean toward one footnote in the
rules. It might be kind to the reader to add a reminder footnote for
each situation that we recognize, but with one footnote in the rules
section, they have no excuse to be confused when it happens even if we
neglect to put it in the section. We can do both if that helps
everyone sleep better at night. *smile*]
(??) 04wotw 170 #1:  [jb: similarly vetoed. "draws"]
(??) 04wotw 166 #1:  [jb: Agreed, er... vetoed - the change that is. "tells"]
(??) 04wotw 108 #1:  [jb: Enchantment]
(??) 04wotw 47 #3:  [jb: Although the term <quote>Agarashi</quote> is
not used in anywhere else in the <cite>Worlds of Lone Wolf</cite>
books, it is used elsewhere as the collective name for the monstrous
servants of Agarash the Damned.]
(??) 04wotw 36 #1:  [jb: I recently found out that, formally,
"neither" and "either" both take singular verbs. So, formally
speaking, this correction should be made.]
(??) 04wotw 25 #4:  [jb: Sounds good to me.]
(??) 04wotw 15 #6:  [jb: I would suggest that "wish to ask" should
become "wish to use the Power of Theurgy and ask"]
(??) 04wotw gamerulz #2:  [jb: I would add it to the same footnote,
but link to the footnote in both places.]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Other related posts: