[projectaon] Re: Editor's Companion Submission
- From: Timothy Pederick <pederick@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:07:42 +0800
2010/1/27 Jonathan Blake <jonathan.blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >> (ft) 16tlov 62: [jc: I think the footnote here is redundant. You cannot
> >> run out of money here. You have got 20 + random Gold Crowns in the
> Equipment
> >> Section, and the drunkard wishes only 10 GC.]
> >
> > Are we going to remove this footnote, Jon?
>
> If we're positive that there is no path that has an explicit way to
> use/lose money.
>
Whatever happened to the SVG flowcharts? It'd be much easier to tell from
those. But upon manual inspection, I'm pretty sure that the only way to
section 62 is this:
1 -> 105 -> 315 or 202 -> 100 -> 133 -> 49 or 262 -> 238 -> 84 -> 287 ->
62
which has no money spent or lost anywhere.
I also found these along the way:
(??) 16tlov 105: you choose not to dwell here -> you choose not to delay
here [tp: Or "tarry" or "stop" or any of numerous other synonyms; anything
but "dwell", which (notwithstanding the phrase "dwell on/upon") I've never
seen used to mean "stay for a little while", rather than "take up
residence"]
(??) 16tlov 105: give rise for concern -> give cause for concern [tp: Or
perhaps "give rise to concern"]
--
Tim Pederick
Other related posts:
