[projectaon] Re: 02fotw errata
- From: Jonathan Blake <jonathan.blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:56:11 -0700
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 29/07/2010 17:37, Jonathan Blake wrote:
>>
>> (er) 37, 148: East Bank Walk -> West Bank Walk [tp: Just a
>> possibility; you are west of the River Dorn at this stage, though not
>> on its banks. The street doesn't go to the river banks, either;
>> section 323 strongly implies that it ends and becomes Lookout Street.
>> I'm not sure what else the street name could be referring to. A bank
>> of the financial kind?]
>> (er) 86, 194: Westbank Wharf -> Eastbank Wharf [tp: This one's
>> more
>> certain: the geography clearly indicates that you are on the east bank
>> of the River Dorn at this stage. While we're at it, should we
>> standardise X Bank vs. Xbank?]
>>
>> I'm OK with fixing these, but we should gather a solid list of reasons
>> that we're making these changes so they can go on the errata page.
>
> To paraphrase Tim Pederick's comments, how about:
>
> Replaced "East Bank Walk" with "West Bank Walk" since you are west of the
> River Dorn at this stage, though not on its banks; nor does the street go
> to the river bank, as Section 323 strongly implies that it ends and becomes
> Lookout Street (cf. erratum for Section 86, re: "Westbank Wharf").
>
> Replaced "Westbank Wharf" with "Eastbank Wharf" since the geography clearly
> indicates that you are on the east bank of the River Dorn at this stage (cf.
> erratum for Section 37, re: "East Bank Walk").
Do we have a section that would make clear what we mean by "geography"
in the second case?
>> (er) 142, 263: [tp: the red and white passes must be collectable
>> even
>> if you don't have a backpack. To this end, they could be footnoted as
>> being non-items, like the forged papers (s.327), or they could just be
>> Special Items.]
>> (er) 142, 246: white pass -> White Pass
>> (er) 246, 263: red pass -> Red Pass
>>
>> I lean toward footnoting them as Special Items. Thoughts?
>
> So, the footnote should read something like: "The pass need not be marked on
> your Action Chart (and thus do not require a Backpack to carry them in)."
> And the proposed capitalisation of red pass and white pass can be rejected?
How about "Mark the Pass on you Action Chart as a Special Item." I
meant to accept the capitalization.
--
Jon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
