-=PCTechTalk=- Re: SpamAarrest??
- From: "David Weaver" <djweaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:57:58 -0400
The fact of the matter is according to Spam Arrest he can preauthorize
people. Why we should have to do it, is beyond me. If you rely on this
service, then you become responsible for setting it up, not trying to
get someone else to do it for you.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: pctechtalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pctechtalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Carneal
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 8:32 PM
To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: SpamAarrest??
<Copy>
OK an opinion here. All the person needs to do is allow the posts
coming
from this list and none of us would be receive this type of an email
asking
us to click a link.
<End>
Does it work like that? What I mean is can the person allow posts coming
from this list (or any list the request) group wide? I am thinking that
it
is coming from John Doe, rather than the list, so the user of the
service
would have to allow everyone in the group to send a post and then be
able
to receive it.
But, if it works like that, that seems the simplest solution.
Robert
To unsub or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
For more info: //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk
To unsub or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
For more info:
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk
Other related posts:
