-=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: "GMan" <gman.pctt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:48:34 -0400
Hi Don (and anyone else interessted in this thread),
Two posts ago, I included a note requesting that noone but Rose and
myself reply directly to this particular thread. This way, Rose and I will
be able to better keep track of everything we
discuss/accept/dismiss/alter/contemplate/postulate/consider/etc.. Instead,
all comments, suggestions, disagreements, or anything else should be posted
to a separate, but related thread. I have reposted the note below for
anyone who may have missed it.
(reposted from April 26 @ 9:11PM)
NOTE:
The main reason we're doing this over the list is so that anyone interested
can (try to) follow along to gain some ideas for their own organization
system. Even so, I am still treating it as I would treat any private
discussion I might have with someone on this subject. As a result, I am
asking that no one but Rose and I send in anything under this thread. If
anyone would like to make a suggestion, argue a point or otherwise
contribute to our private thread, don't hesitate to send it in under a
subject line of "Organizational Suppliment". My time has become rather
limited recently (and I'll be out of town from May 1st to the 4th), so I
will most likely limit my focus to this thread and the Suppliment one.
Peace,
GMan
"The only dumb questions are the ones that are never asked!"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don WIlcox" <Dwilcox3@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:40 AM
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational
Method
> Rose,
>
> If dual booting to two different OSs seems too daunting, try cloning your
> primary to a second hard drive.
>
> If you leave the drive installed as a secondary drive you can always
> restart to the boot menu and select the secondary drive to boot with.
>
> Or, after you verify a working clone, remove the drive and put it in a
> safe
> place to use if you need it.
>
> Don
--
Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything
below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary.
To unsubscribe or change your email settings:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
http://www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
- Follow-Ups:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Organizational Suppliment
- From: Don WIlcox
- References:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Don WIlcox
Other related posts:
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- -=PCTechTalk=- Organizational Suppliment
- From: Don WIlcox
- -=PCTechTalk=- Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Don WIlcox