-=PCTechTalk=- Organizational Suppliment
- From: "Don WIlcox" <Dwilcox3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:48:17 -0400
My apologies. I seldom look at the subject line because too often they are
not accurate. Instead I read a bit of the message body to determine if it
is a topic I want to read and possibly reply to.
In this case, the message body content was fear of dual booting. Had it
been about organizing hard drives, I probably would not have replied to it
because I probably would not have read it all.
Since Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method is not a topic I am
particularly interested in I will filter that topic to avoid responding to
it again.
Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "GMan" <gman.pctt@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 7:48 PM
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational
Method
> Hi Don (and anyone else interessted in this thread),
> Two posts ago, I included a note requesting that noone but Rose and
> myself reply directly to this particular thread. This way, Rose and I
> will
> be able to better keep track of everything we
> discuss/accept/dismiss/alter/contemplate/postulate/consider/etc..
> Instead,
> all comments, suggestions, disagreements, or anything else should be
> posted
> to a separate, but related thread. I have reposted the note below for
> anyone who may have missed it.
>
> (reposted from April 26 @ 9:11PM)
> NOTE:
> The main reason we're doing this over the list is so that anyone
> interested
> can (try to) follow along to gain some ideas for their own organization
> system. Even so, I am still treating it as I would treat any private
> discussion I might have with someone on this subject. As a result, I am
> asking that no one but Rose and I send in anything under this thread. If
> anyone would like to make a suggestion, argue a point or otherwise
> contribute to our private thread, don't hesitate to send it in under a
> subject line of "Organizational Suppliment". My time has become rather
> limited recently (and I'll be out of town from May 1st to the 4th), so I
> will most likely limit my focus to this thread and the Suppliment one.
>
> Peace,
> GMan
>
> "The only dumb questions are the ones that are never asked!"
--
Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything
below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary.
To unsubscribe or change your email settings:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
http://www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Don WIlcox
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
Other related posts:
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Organizational Suppliment
- -=PCTechTalk=- Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Tech Rose - LoveBytes
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: Don WIlcox
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Rose's Completely Simplified Organizational Method
- From: GMan