RE: Oracle on Windows Vs. Linux
- From: "Freeman, Donald" <dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "mkb" <mkb125@xxxxxxxxx>, "Freeman, Donald" <dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:30:24 -0400
We're using Redhat Enterprise Version 3. Don't know why that one was
picked.
-----Original Message-----
From: mkb [mailto:mkb125@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 3:11 PM
To: dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Oracle on Windows Vs. Linux
--- "Freeman, Donald" <dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We set up a side by side comparison to test our
> Oracle DB application on
> Windows 2003 32 Bit vs. Red Hat Linux. We set up
> two virtual
> partitions and alternately stopped one and tested
> the other. We have
> been reading different benchmark tests and came to
> believe that we would
> see a 30% to 40% performance advantage using linux.
> We used Load
> Runner and tested three program functions with
> 30-60-90 users. Windows
> performed about 10% better. Does anybody have any
> advice or
> observations on this? Any configuration advice?
>
> Don Freeman
> Database Administrator 1
> Bureau of Information Technology
> Pennsylvania Department of Health
> (717) 703-5782
>
>
What version of Linux?
I do believe that the 2.6 kernel has better IO
performance than the 2.4 kernel.
If you're on 2.4, I'd try and upgrade to 2.6 and see
if that makes any difference.
--
mohammed
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
