Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- From: bill thater <shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: gelfand.transform@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:18:25 -0500
> or perhaps we can say that a sound description of the data model in
> mathematical terms is necessary BUT is not enough. For example if=3D20
> you don't know what you lose with 'denormalization' you could be in Dire=
=3D20
> Straits.
and then you'd have to do the walk of life or want your MTV.;-)
--=20
--
Bill "Shrek" Thater ORACLE DBA =20
shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx=20
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Zen is not easy.
It takes effort to attain nothingness.
And then what do you have?
Bupkes." -- The Goddess
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date