Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- From: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: mgogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:13:04 -0400
Mladen,
Maybe the author knew the main turn off for most is math in the book, so he
kept to his minimum?
8:)
Raj
On 6/13/05, Mladen Gogala <mgogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The book is good, but it needs more math.
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
> Ext. 121
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date