Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- From: Mario Cariggi <gelfand.transform@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:08:19 +0200
Hi Stphen,
>=20
> I think there has to be a balance between producing pretty diagrams
> and producing a system that will actually fulfil the spec and do what
> it's supposed to do.
or perhaps we can say that a sound description of the data model in
mathematical terms is necessary BUT is not enough. For example if=20
you don't know what you lose with 'denormalization' you could be in Dire=20
Straits.
kind regards.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date