[opendtv] Re: The "real" problem with OFDM in the U.S.

  • From: cbenham@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:19:52 +0000

I'm just trying to get people to think realistically about what they write.
No more, no less.


> And, just why do you need to put that into a question?  The answer was
> obvious about 5 years ago, shortly after Bert joined the list.
> 
> John Willkie
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Cliff Benham" <cliff.benham@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:55 AM
> Subject: [opendtv] Re: The "real" problem with OFDM in the U.S.
> 
> 
> > Several ancient Greek philosophers were arguing about 'how
> > many teeth a horse has.' Finally one of the younger of the group
> > who had remained silent for the whole time asked,=20
> > "Why not find a horse and count them?"
> > The others suggested he should remain silent until he better understood
> > what they were talking about.
> >
> > So is the object here to test your skills of debate and reasoning or to=20
> > get the correct information?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Manfredi, Albert E
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:36 PM
> > To: OpenDTV (E-mail)
> > Subject: [opendtv] Re: The "real" problem with OFDM in the U.S.
> >
> >
> > Cliff Benham wrote:
> >
> > > HA! Do you really think the owners of all those
> > > stations would ever consider moving their towers?
> >
> > Cliff, let's stay on thread here. we're talking about
> > creating a fictitious new system of national networks.
> > Nothing to do with current owners.
> >
> > > You still don't get it. My antenna IS aimed at
> > > Philadelphia.
> >
> > You're the one not getting it.
> >
> > If these are national networks now, you would aim
> > your antenna at the best signal source. Not
> > necessarily the closest one.
> >
> > Philadelphia being weaker would be a perfect reason
> > to ignore Phila "repeaters" and go with Baltimore
> > instead. National networks, get it? No reason to
> > worry about local "markets."
> >
> > This is exactly how European OTA users in rural
> > communities aim their antennas. At the best source.
> >
> > By the way, that pattern I showed, where the
> > Wash/Balt and NYC frequencies would be the same,
> > and the Phildelphia frequencies are between these,
> > would hbe repeated up and down the East Coast.
> > So Richmond VA would be like Phila, perhaps Boston
> > too. And so on.
> >
> > Bert
> > =20
> > =20
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
> >
> > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at =
> > FreeLists.org=20
> >
> > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word =
> > unsubscribe in the subject line.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
> >
> > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
> >
> > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
> >
> 
>  
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
> 
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
> FreeLists.org 
> 
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
> 
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: