Docs where I live (midwest) are *extremely* reluctant to prescribe anything with codeine. It took 2 weeks of uncontrollable sever coughing and a diagnosis of pneumonia to get cough syrup w/ codeine for my kiddo. They've started prescribing something with a drug in it that is codeine-like but non-narcotic -- wish I could remember the name of it. Maybe someone here knows. I would like to know more about the comparative efficacy of the two. Julie Krueger ========Original Message======== Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: flu vaccine Date: 10/30/04 3:26:20 PM Central Daylight Time From: _vcaley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:vcaley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on: A.A. With all due respect, this sounds like the 1980's equivalent of the 1930's "he started by selling apples in the street and became a millionaire" story. I won't call it quite a myth but it may qualify for exaggeration. Secretly making medicines in his home? With no regulation, no approval? If this is true, he is a criminal, since medication is strictly regulated in this country (except vitamins and supplements, but you all know that). I think if you investigated the story you'd see a lot of fortune telling style ambiguities. > > Actually, at least through the fifties, paregoric, a narcotic concoction was available over the counter. It was used for colicky babies and menstrual cramps and I am sure addicts were using it. Cough syrup with codeine was available in the US until about twenty years ago, then about ten years or so ago with signature of purchaser. Now it's a prescription drug. In Canada, aspirin and Tylenol with codeine was available over the counter until relatively recently, as was cough syrup with codeine. I wonder how many people consume illegal drugs nowadays because they actually do have some health problem that might not be diagnosed or they don't have the money for a doctor or who knows what other reason. Veronica Milford, MI > [Original Message] > From: Andy Amago <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 10/30/2004 10:19:04 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: flu vaccine > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eternitytime1@xxxxxxx > Sent: Oct 29, 2004 4:35 PM > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: flu vaccine > > > In a message dated 10/29/2004 9:04:34 AM Central Daylight Time, > aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > But, being pure capitalism, with no restrictions by government, you could > solve the problem by going into your basement and mixing up a nice sugar > solution and hawking it and making a bundle. > > > Actually, that is exactly what happened, once in Kansas City. (Though it > was not a nice sugar solution). "Ewing Kauffman founded Marion Laboratories > Inc., operating out of his modest Kansas City residence. He used his middle > name, rather than his last name, so customers would not perceive him as a > one-man operation. By 1989, when Marion Laboratories was sold to Merrell Dow, it > had become a global diversified pharmaceutical giant with annual sales of > nearly $1 billion." > > He had been a pharmeucetical salesman--and was the top one at the company > where he worked. He was given a 'cap' on how much he could make (no matter how > much he sold) and it made him cross. So, he ended up mixing up batches of > similar medicines to what he had been selling and then would go out and sell > them. (I don't remember all the details--have heard this story many times, > though, since his foundation is located here in KC and they let lots of groups > use their facilities...) > > > A.A. With all due respect, this sounds like the the 1980's equivalent of the 1930's "he started by selling apples in the street and became a millionaire" story. I won't call it quite a myth but it may qualify for exaggeration. Secretly making medicines in his home? With no regulation, no approval? If this is true, he is a criminal, since medication is strictly regulated in this country (except vitamins and supplements, but you all know that). I think if you investigated the story you'd see a lot of fortune telling style ambiguities. > > > > M.B. You do have a good point about the funding for the CDC being cut. I am sure > that, like most people, they do the best with what they have. > > My point, though, was more to say that if we are really going to do this > governmental health thing, then why don't we really do it and do it so it works? > Coordinate it, give them the tools to make it work and all of that. Or, > if we are not, then let's really not... > > > > A.A. What is a governmental health thing? > > > Andy Amago > > > > > Dreaming about making $$ in pharmeucetical sales, > "Better Living Through Chemistry" Marlena in Missouri > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html