On 1/21/07, Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At least one, and perhaps the most important one. It is also one that such diverse modern non-religious thinkers as Jurgen Habermas and Derrida acknowledge is necessary but missing. Further, it is missing because it must be missing. What liberal democracy could not and cannot borrow from Christianity is the benevolence of hope.
Phil, Please explain this astonishing statement. What else is liberal democracy than the triumph of hope that the world can be a better place? For God's sake, man, when we elected Bill Clinton President, we elected "the man from Hope." When Kerry lost, his slogan was "Hope is on the way." It is commonplace for us Democrats to define ourselves as the party of hope. You can, of course, be using "Hope" in some technical manner, e.g., the hope of salvation in a theological sense, in which case I suppose that many of us here are, indeed, hopeless. Pray, what do you mean? John -- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN Tel. +81-45-314-9324 http://www.wordworks.jp/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html