[lit-ideas] Re: Should Chirac join Bush in oblivion?

Sunday, October 31, 2004, 6:53:02 PM, Eric Yost wrote:

EY> Judy offered "to explain, by means of a recap. Didier gave reasons why
EY> the US should vote Bush out. You replied by giving a reason, of a
EY> different kind, why the French should vote Chirac out. I then posted
EY> giving yet another kind of reason why the US should vote Bush out."

EY> _____

EY> And of course Judy is right to do so. There are lots of (internal US)
EY> reasons for voting Bush back to Crawford: the Patriot Act and the 
EY> possibility of Patriot Act II, his supply-side tax cuts during war time,
EY> the Republican party's morbid monopoly in public forums, his 
EY> environmental record, his job outsourcing policies, his Christian 
EY> agenda, his lack of bipartisanship in framing legislation, and the
EY> prospect of his appointing Supreme Court justices who would carry his
EY> "values" forward for decades.

EY> There are also lots of international reasons to vote Bush to oblivion.

EY> But why stop there?

Because there's an election in the US on Tuesday; because of the
composition of this list; because of media coverage of the US
election; etc..

Come Wednesday, we can talk about voting Blair into history.


--   Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: