--- John McCreery <mccreery@xxxxxxx> wrote: > "But to steal the words from Humbert, the > poet/criminal of _Lolita_ > [now, it seems to me, a curious tricksy embodiment > both of the men who > deny the reality of women's individuality by > subsuming them in their > fantasies and, simultaneously, of the > "poet/criminal" status of the > women who are, surreptitiously in Islamic > Revolutionary Iran, reading > _Lolita_]...but, the quote continues, "I need you, > the reader, to > imagine us, for we won't really exist if you don't." > > As a sociologist/social anthropologist who has read > George Herbert > Mead, Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, I am tempted > to say, "Ah, hah, > these women's individuality will remain unreal > unless others, we > readers, recognize and thus rescue it from the > obliteration symbolized > by the robes and scarves that reduce them to an > ayatollah's idea of > Woman instead of individual women. Great example of > the social > construction of reality..." Lolita would seem like a bit strange choice of book to serve as a tool of women's liberation. Well, let a thousand flowers blossom. O.K. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html