--- John McCreery <mccreery@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2004/06/03, at 13:45, Omar Kusturica wrote: > > > > > Whereas, had the Communists won out, they would > have > > used the power to create a political, social, > economic > > and cultural paradize, as they did elsewhere. > > > Were these the only alternatives available? That's a good question. There were other alternatives but it's not clear how much popular support and/or determination they had. There was a moderate Islamist party lead by Ayatollah Shariatmadari, but they later disbandied to avoid conflict with Khomeini. (A fairly tame type of Islamists, it would seem.) There was the liberal Freedom Movement of Iran, founded by Mossadegh (the one toppled by the CIA in 1963), which at the time was lead by Mehdi Bazargan. Bazargan was Iran's first prime minister after the Revolution, but resigned after only one year. The party continued to function for a while after that but gradually it got marginalized, until it was finally banned in 2002. There were the Mujaheedin Kalk, an Islamist Marxist organization, which after it failed to obtain any seats in the 1980 parliamentary election started engaging in pretty serious terrorist actions and also established a rapport with Saddam Husssein, with whom Iran was then in war. Hussein was supported by the US, while the Soviet Union also would have loved to see the Islamic Revolution fail. This situation was used by Khomeini as a pre-text to crack down on all left-wing groups and other opposition. Obviously, the early years of the Islamic Revolution were chaotic and dangerous times, but don't seem to have been more so than the early years of the French, Russian, or Chinese revolutions. O.K. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html