In a message dated 4/20/2004 9:45:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mccreery@xxxxxxx writes: can think of two possibilities. Cerrie has provided an example of one, paying close attention to the details, which communicate differences as well as similarities to whatever analogous figures come to mind, based on the worlds in which we individually live. The other is to shift the plane of the argument, as Nafisi tries to do here, from any particular case to a more abstract and general perspective. The first of these possibilities appeals to the anthropologist in me; the second to the philosopher I once thought I might become. But what am I missing here? The first, Ceri's example, is also the more Nabokovian route. There's a scene in _Ada_ where a character asks another "Is that your father sitting under the elm tree?" The reply, "No, it's an oak tree," reminds us to pay attention to the particulars, the details, which is where we all live. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html