Actually, the perception is that VR exists. The program and equipment that generate the perception may exist, but the 'space' is mere illusion. And 'love', well in truth it's nought but the need, or perceieved need, for the person we think we love. It's a desperate cry for validation through reciprocal illusion. Genuine love, if such a thing truly exists, is an appreciation of, or at least repect for, the entirety (the sum) of another's qualities, whether (personally - selfishly) desirable and undesirable. We shouldn't need another to love us, nor should we need them to behave in a fashion desirable to us, in order to feel that love. And hate, pfft, it's nought but the selfish side of the same coin. If end of the illusion causes us profound emotional pain, it is far simpler, though childishly unhealthy, to relegate a person's actions to the realm of despicability than to accept that we are equally as flawed... flawed, but resisting admission, d. What about virtual reality? It exists and doesn't exist at the same time. Therefore, it's true and false at the same time, no? Or since hate sometimes (often, really, it's all so unconscious) masquerades as love, love can be true and false at the same time too, no? For that matter the relativity of the word 'truth' can make it true and false at the same time. Yes? --- On Sat, 5/31/08, wokshevs@xxxxxx <wokshevs@xxxxxx> wrote: From: wokshevs@xxxxxx <wokshevs@xxxxxx> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Here's a new spin on preventative medicine To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Eric Yost" Date: Saturday, May 31, 2008, 5:04 PM Quoting Eric Yost mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>: snip > Simultaneously true and false! But not in the same respect - as the Macedonian philosopher was wont to say. No statement can be both true and false in the same sense, including this one. -- Mail.com Autos- Powered by Oncars.com: Drive By Today! http://www.oncars.com