[lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- From: Judy Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 03:05:17 +0100
Saturday, October 15, 2005, 2:35:13 AM, Paul Stone wrote:
PS> That was a mistake and I might add that Camp apologized for the repeat
PS> posting.
I got 2 of the 4 after he apologised!
PS> I would dare say that the quality is DIRECTLY relevant. Camp has
PS> been censored because of the nature of the post's articles. If they were
PS> high "quality", no one would have said "BOO"! That's what I'm complaining
PS> about.
I was about to say something (I had said something, re Camp as a
troll; I was about to suggest filtering him) and I do not regard
all the material he posted as low-quality. My objection is to his
posting this material and nothing else. As you wrote
PS>Someone responded to the tax one by saying "why don't you tells
PS>us what's wrong", but nobody [camp included] DID tell us what's wrong
Camp should have told us...
--
mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
